Counter-Strike 2 gaming using Neuralink is 'insane' claims second human brain computer interface implant patient
The patient has also used a CAD app to design a custom 3D-printed Neuralink charger accessory.
The second human Neuralink implant patient enjoys playing Counter-Strike 2 using his Link brain-computer interface (BCI). Alex, a spinal cord injury patient, only received the implant last month but has been quick to adapt to the benefits the BCI provides, using CAD applications and gaming. Moreover, it is hoped that Link will provide him with greater autonomy via robot arm and wheelchair controls.
The video shows Alex and his CS2 teammates in action, wasting the hapless opposing forces. Before he got the Link implant, Alex dabbled in CS2 using an assistive device called the Quadstick. Neuralink described this controller as “a mouth-operated joystick with sip-and-puff pressure sensors and a lip position sensor for clicking.”
However, playing fast-paced FPS games like CS2 requires at least two joysticks (if going down the controller route)—one for movement and another for crosshair positioning. The Quadstick’s singular joystick thus requires the user to toggle its stick input to switch between movement and targeting, limiting the game’s traditional appeal.
Alex was enthusiastic about the newfound deftness in gaming controls via the BCI. “Just running around is so enjoyable because I can look side to side and not need to move Quadstick left and right… I can [think about where to] look, and it goes where I want it to. It’s insane,” said the second human Neuralink implant study patient.
Beyond the headlining gaming high-jinks, we’ve already mentioned that Alex has been using a CAD program via BCI. As a former automotive technician, Neuralink implant patient No.2 enjoyed working on physical projects. He has already designed a custom mount for his Neuralink charger, which has been 3D printed and integrated into his setup. There’s a video demo of this on the Neuralink blog if you want to check Alex’s interactions. Meanwhile, Neuralink says it is improving Link productivity by mapping intended movements to different mouse clicks (e.g., left, right, middle).
In the latest blog posts, it is also interesting to read about how a human/BCI interaction called ‘thread retraction’ has been reduced for Alex. As you may have guessed, this phenomenon results in reduced BCI performance. Thankfully, this second human test subject had the BCI implant with several proactive mitigations, and the scientists behind this technology assert that they have “observed no thread retraction in our second participant.”
Going forward, Neuralink scientists will continue to improve BCI interaction performance with controllers and computer input devices. Alex seems enthused with what he has experienced thus far. Neuralink, therefore, looks set to improve life quality for those unable to move limbs and could do the same/similar for neurological conditions like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), reckons the team behind this BCI tech.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
jg.millirem After a life-changing spinal cord injury I would not want to spend my time pretend-warmaking.Reply -
derekullo
Without much of the fine motor controls in his hands and feet he can't really run in a field or create pottery.jg.millirem said:After a life-changing spinal cord injury I would not want to spend my time pretend-warmaking.
If he liked playing wargames before the injury he will probably like playing them after. -
salgado18 I think a current limitation of the neuralink is that it has to be mapped to keys and buttons, instead of using the natural flow of the brain to translate into things. I mean, instead of thinking of CAD commands, the user could think of the shape itself. I know that's a big step for the tech, and it would require a brand new CAD software for example, but if it can be done, then there os a serious use case for it.Reply
Well, if it proves safe from every aspect, obviously (medical, electronical, hacking, etc)