CrowdStrike's market cap plunges $12.5 billion in wake of global outage

CrowdStrike stock
(Image credit: Pexels)

The impact of the recent CrowdStrike outage is hitting the company where it hurts — in the wallet. Overnight predictions saw up to 21% being knocked off the company's stock price, equal to around $16 billion in market cap. The situation is only moderately better in the cold light of day — we've been tracking MarketWatch, and at the time of publication, CrowdStrike has seen a 15% drop in its shares, wiping $12.5 billion off its market cap. 

If you've been affected by the CrowdStrike outage, we've got a guide on how to fix it in just three minutes. We also have full coverage of the event and its slow resolution.

During the early hours of the outage, CNBC reported that shares in CrowdStrike had fallen sharply by 20%, around $16 billion, which Faisal Islam, BBC Economics Editor, confirmed. Even Microsoft wasn't immune; its share price dropped by 2.5%, but still nowhere near as damaging as the 12.5% now experienced by CrowdStrike. 

CrowdStrike ended trading on July 18 at $343.05, and when trading resumed on July 19, it opened at $294.51. At the time of writing, the share price is hovering between $308.70 and $309.19. According to MarketWatch's price tracker, the share price has decreased 16.69% over the last five days and 16.82% over the month. 

Earlier today, George Kurtz, President and CEO of Crowdstrike, released a statement via X (formerly Twitter) to respond to the many hours of silence during which millions of users were left in the dark about the root cause of the issue.

"CrowdStrike is actively working with customers impacted by a defect found in a single content update for Windows hosts. Mac and Linux hosts are not impacted. This is not a security incident or cyberattack. The issue has been identified, isolated and a fix has been deployed. We refer customers to the support portal for the latest updates and will continue to provide complete and continuous updates on our website. We further recommend organizations ensure they’re communicating with CrowdStrike representatives through official channels. Our team is fully mobilized to ensure the security and stability of CrowdStrike customers."

Originally, the crashing issues were thought to be related to Microsoft's Azure and Ofice365, but other users reported the same issue. 

Later in the day, Kurtz was interviewed by NBC and confirmed that the update was the root cause of the outage. Kurtz describes the update as a "content update," which sounds like it wasn't a big update. We don't know what the update was, but for an update to a globally used security application, one would assume that all updates are checked during a testing phase before release. 

Global IT outage: 'We're deeply sorry', CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz says - YouTube Global IT outage: 'We're deeply sorry', CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz says - YouTube
Watch On

The ramifications of just one update have been felt around the world. IT systems for hospitals, transportation, payroll, and even the Mercedes F1 team felt the impact of the outage during setup for the upcoming Hungarian Grand Prix. What's ironic is that CrowdStrike advertises on the Mercedes F1 team cars and overalls.

Les Pounder

Les Pounder is an associate editor at Tom's Hardware. He is a creative technologist and for seven years has created projects to educate and inspire minds both young and old. He has worked with the Raspberry Pi Foundation to write and deliver their teacher training program "Picademy".

  • thisisaname
    Buy now and profit when they go back up again?
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    thisisaname said:
    Buy now and profit when they go back up again?
    usually I would say yes but it needs to drop more.

    If that was 30% I would hit go.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    thisisaname said:
    Buy now and profit when they go back up again?
    This one might take some time, but yes, I think it will rebound after a few months, maybe 6 months IMO. The loss of confidence will take a little time to work off, but if there are no other incidents it will be forgotten.
    Reply
  • NedSmelly
    thisisaname said:
    Buy now and profit when they go back up again?
    Whether this happens would depend upon whether they get sued up the wazoo in the coming months.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    And people was losing their minds with Log4J xD!

    Also, maybe the CEO can go back to McAfee? He was the CTO.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • Kondamin
    thisisaname said:
    Buy now and profit when they go back up again?
    The amount of damages they caused should be enough for them to be sued out of existence.
    And this should be a trigger for governments and large corporations to not have their entire production stack reliant on a single vendor
    Reply
  • Wimpers
    What kind of idiot lets a cloud based security framework push drivers on Windows without giving the companies the possibility to test them on a few non-critical and easily restorable servers first?
    All that stuff should be in userland, because we all saw what happens when this goes wrong, and basically you can't do <Mod Edit> anything if the thing doesn't boot properly.

    And why is this needed on laptops and PC's? Never store anything locally, if you have a problem (or virus) we'll wipe + reinstall, patch and update your device in an hour or so instead of wasting time trying to look for a solution.
    Reply
  • FoxTread3
    July 20, 2024 - This is an example of why I have gone on rants in various comments forums about excessively depending on computer related Tech. I love computers and Tech in general. However, I have been baffled and irked by the naive attitude that many Tech pundits, big business, organizations, governmental agencies, and the general public. Have regarding computer systems, and Tech related products and services. My point is that in essence "not putting your eggs in one basket" has proven to be more than wise advice when it comes to the use of afore mentioned computers, Tech products, and services. I have to wonder why, as stated by other commenters in this forum. That backup systems are not in place for all vital computer based systems. It's like hiring one guy to be your security guard, and having no security when he calls out sick. Other than that, I have received some "thumbs down" on posts I have written on the general publics' whole sale acceptance of Tech in their lives. Of course a lot of it has to do with governments and businesses going all in on Tech. "Cashless society", ummm.. yeah.. until your bank can't process your request for funds because like in this CrowdStrike
    outage. Your bank's computer system is down. "Store everything in the Cloud", yeah.. fine.. until the "Cloud" can't be accessed for some reason. My favorite example of things going wrong, which even the people that were effected have probably forgotten. Is when parts of New York City suffered an extreme weather event some years back and the power was out. People couldn't use ATM machines, people that lived or worked in buildings that required swipe cards to enter or exit. Couldn't do either because there was no power. So, my point is, that there should always be a back up. Actual cash on hand, files backed up on hard drives that are readily accessible, and having a backup plan for when the electricity and/or computer systems become inoperable. The extreme reliance on Tech without backups is unwise to say the least, and connecting all devices and services for "convenience" is certainly unwise. Stay well all. :blush:
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    FoxTread3 said:
    July 20, 2024 - This is an example of why I have gone on rants in various comments forums about excessively depending on computer related Tech. I love computers and Tech in general. However, I have been baffled and irked by the naive attitude that many Tech pundits, big business, organizations, governmental agencies, and the general public. Have regarding computer systems, and Tech related products and services. My point is that in essence "not putting your eggs in one basket" has proven to be more than wise advice when it comes to the use of afore mentioned computers, Tech products, and services. I have to wonder why, as stated by other commenters in this forum. That backup systems are not in place for all vital computer based systems. It's like hiring one guy to be your security guard, and having no security when he calls out sick. Other than that, I have received some "thumbs down" on posts I have written on the general publics' whole sale acceptance of Tech in their lives. Of course a lot of it has to do with governments and businesses going all in on Tech. "Cashless society", ummm.. yeah.. until your bank can't process your request for funds because like in this CrowdStrike
    outage. Your bank's computer system is down. "Store everything in the Cloud", yeah.. fine.. until the "Cloud" can't be accessed for some reason. My favorite example of things going wrong, which even the people that were effected have probably forgotten. Is when parts of New York City suffered an extreme weather event some years back and the power was out. People couldn't use ATM machines, people that lived or worked in buildings that required swipe cards to enter or exit. Couldn't do either because there was no power. So, my point is, that there should always be a back up. Actual cash on hand, files backed up on hard drives that are readily accessible, and having a backup plan for when the electricity and/or computer systems become inoperable. The extreme reliance on Tech without backups is unwise to say the least, and connecting all devices and services for "convenience" is certainly unwise. Stay well all. :blush:
    You wrote alot here but I think it always comes down to cost.

    A company that knows the value of their data and how downtime will affect them will have a plan b and not have all of this relying on a single vendor. So if downtime will affect your stock where you are losing billions on day 2 you will most likely have redundancies in place.
    Reply
  • FoxTread3
    Makaveli said:
    You wrote alot here but I think it always comes down to cost.

    A company that knows the value of their data and how downtime will affect them will have a plan b and not have all of this relying on a single vendor. So if downtime will affect your stock where you are losing billions on day 2 you will most likely have redundancies in place.
    July 20, 2024 - Thank you for your kind and interesting reply. I have absolutely no reason to disagree with, or counter your observations. I would say, mistakenly possibly, that most business and governmental bodies make their decisions with cost being one of their primary concerns. The wisdom of this depends on those entities' objectives and perceived risks. Aside from that, I think a lot people in all walks of life, and in various hierarchies have little knowledge about the workings of the Technologies they are using and/or purchasing. As you said in your comments, I tend to "write a lot" and that is due to my loquaciousness, (no offense taken :wink:). My basic intention was to draw attention to how we as a society view and use Tech. Anything man made is subject to failure, and my point is that we should be prepared for eventual failures as much as possible. Both in our private lives, and in the vital areas that are basic to our way of life. You will note that I made a couple of suggestions. Stay well, and thank you. 😊
    Reply