Sanctioned China firms creating front companies to acquire AI chips, says report — new firms pop up faster than the U.S. ban hammer can strike

Chips on map of China
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

America has tough sanctions in place to stop China from acquiring the latest chips, fearing their use in weapons systems. Yet many Chinese companies have still been able to acquire advanced U.S. hardware, even as Nvidia and other key tech firms adhere to those tight export controls. The latest Chinese ruse to sidestep sanctions, according to reports, is to set up a new company to trade advanced hardware — and run it until it gets whack-a-moled.

The New York Times today reported observing deals ranging from a few hundred GPUs up to a transaction worth $103 million, with buyers including state-owned or -affiliated companies and sanctioned corporations that work with the Chinese defense industry. While there is no evidence that the manufacturers have directly sold these products to the Chinese market, it’s impossible for any company to fully control the spider's web of its entire distribution chain. While an organization could track its immediate customers, and maybe even secondary buyers, following the movements of products until they reach end-users would not be just time-consuming, it would be cost-prohibitive as well. It might also even push legitimate clients away.

Banned Sugon formed Nettrix to acquire Nvidia chips

Another problem that the U.S. authorities have is how easy it is to set up a company and acquire advanced chips before the American ban hammer falls on it. For example, the U.S. banned Sugon from acquiring Nvidia’s chips after it was proven that the Chinese military was a customer. Some of the company’s former executives then formed a new company called Nettrix, and in six months, it was one of the largest Chinese manufacturers of AI servers.

Since the company is so new, the U.S. likely hasn’t had the chance to vet it and check its background. In the meantime, Nvidia, Intel, and Microsoft have already started doing business with it without breaking any American laws.

Perhaps the only possible way the White House could drastically reduce Chinese backdoors to trade is to ensure that only licensed white-listed buyers could legally procure these chips. However, many in the industry are lobbying against ever-tightening bans, claiming they do more harm than good to American companies.

China and the U.S. have been engaged in a tight chip war since the late 2010s, with both countries fighting to remain at the lead of AI and other advanced technologies. In line with this, America has resorted to bans and sanctions to stop Chinese companies from getting the latest American tech.

However, these reports show that Washington’s moves aren’t always effective against China’s insatiable demand for the latest chips. American authorities admit that some high-tech gear will slip through the cracks. However, they say that the main purpose of the White House’s moves is to hold back Beijing while the U.S. government is pushing investments in the semiconductor industry to help America pull away from China’s gains.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Pierce2623
    Simple. Change H100 and up chips to a market that has to be approved before they can be sold rather than having to be disapproved. Anybody even slightly sketchy looking is out of luck. Sorry if that hurts Nvidia’s bottom line but AI doesn’t exist to enrich jacket boy.
    Reply
  • Blastomonas
    Amusing. The idea that Nvidia, Intel or AMD don't know who they are selling chips to is laughable.

    Hey Nvidia, Nettrix here, please sell me 100,000 of your latest gpus for AI...

    I promise that I'm not really a secret Chinese agency pretending to be a legitimate company.

    I suspect that nVidia, and others just want the cash and don't care about anything else.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Pierce2623 said:
    Simple. Change H100 and up chips to a market that has to be approved before they can be sold rather than having to be disapproved. Anybody even slightly sketchy looking is out of luck. Sorry if that hurts Nvidia’s bottom line but AI doesn’t exist to enrich jacket boy.
    Already are, I think.
    Haven't been able to send most recent Intel processors to China since whenever - at least it was true like thirty years ago, whether it's been true the whole time since then I'm not certain.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Let them have it. When the market realizes LLMs aren't very useful, the bubble will burst and everyone will be holding paperweights. Better for AMD and Nvidia to sell whatever they can before that happens.
    Reply
  • parkerthon
    They fought this issue with Russia too during cold war(and now today). Even heavily sanctioned countries were always able to get our free market tech, and that long before the internet. There’s no feasible way to keep it out of their hands completely without hurting the market. The goal is just to make it more expensive and complicated. This is also where US intelligence needs to do their job. I’d start by repackaging all the defective intel cpus for these front companies. :-)
    Reply
  • jkhoward
    It’s pretty crazy thinking about high end NVIDA, AMD, and INTEL chips making their way into drones and other weapons.. what a time to be alive..
    Reply
  • usertests
    jkhoward said:
    It’s pretty crazy thinking about high end NVIDA, AMD, and INTEL chips making their way into drones and other weapons.. what a time to be alive..
    What a time to die. But I don't think those chips are going into drones or missiles. More likely supercomputers.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    JRStern said:
    Already are, I think.
    Haven't been able to send most recent Intel processors to China since whenever - at least it was true like thirty years ago, whether it's been true the whole time since then I'm not certain.
    No. Currently, if you’re not on the “entity list” or based in China proper, then you’re in the clear with no major red flags. They should change it to system where you’re automatically disapproved unless you meet specific criteria.
    Reply