MSI's Intel-powered Claw gaming handheld starts at $700 — VRR screen confirmed
Add another $100 for the most powerful Ultra-7 with 1TB configuration.
MSI officially released the pricing matrix for its MSI Claw, with configurations starting at $699.99 and going up to $799.99. Also, the big question regarding the Claw display’s variable refresh rate (VRR) support has been answered by The Verge, which says the device’s 7-inch 1080p screen supports rates between 48-120Hz. We still don't have a release date, however.
MSI’s official pricing puts the Claw handheld gaming device on the pricier side of the spectrum. The Claw's main rival, the Asus ROG Ally, currently costs $599.99 for the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme version or $399.99 for the Ryzen Z1 processor packing option — both of these versions can be found at Best Buy.
Recent benchmark leaks indicate that MSI’s Intel-powered Claw and Asus’s AMD-powered ROG Ally (review) aren’t very far apart in terms of performance — despite the difference in underlying architectures. Also, with the MSI Claw's release date still unknown, one wonders how long it will be out before the Asus ROG Ally 2 arrives. Surely MSI can’t be that slow to market, though?
We can't say how well the Claw will perform in real-world tests until we get it in for testing, but we do have the complete specs:
Header Cell - Column 0 | MSI Claw A1M |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H or Core Ultra 7 155H |
Graphics | Intel Arc (integrated) |
Memory | 16GB LPDDR5 |
Storage | 512GB or 1TB PCIe Gen 4 |
Display | 7-inch LCD, 16:9, 1080p, 48-120Hz VRR |
Networking | Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750, Bluetooth 5.4 |
Ports | Thunderbolt 4, microSD, 3.5 mm audio jack |
Battery | 53 WHr |
Operating System | Windows 11 |
Dimensions | 11.57 x 4.6 x 0.83 inches / 294 x 117 x 21.2 mm |
Weight | 1.49 pounds / 675 grams |
Note that the Claw’s screen features VRR support — a desirable quality that it shares with the Asus ROG Ally — which should help deliver smoother on-screen action. MSI told The Verge that the Claw’s 7-inch 1080p screen will be able to dynamically adjust its refresh rate from 48 to 120Hz. By contrast, the Lenovo Legion Go lets users manually pick between 60Hz and 144Hz refresh rates, but does not have a dynamic adjustment feature.
It's also rumored that an MSI Claw configuration with 32GB of RAM onboard is in the works. Details about this alleged configuration haven't surfaced at this time, however, and the top configuration, at $799.99, has the same 16GB of RAM as its cheaper siblings. Perhaps the 32GB model will be added at a later date if there's enough demand.
Anyway, now we've got the full product details, specs, and pricing — all we need is a launch date.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
cknobman Intel = hard passReply
Until consumers can be sure of properly functioning, and optimized drivers, for all versions (especially legacy) of Direct X; buying a handheld like this should be avoided. -
Pierce2623 Once Intel gets their drivers a bit more reliable for gaming, this might be alright. The graphics have already tested out as being quite efficient and graphics is where you try to push the power on these handhelds. You literally turn CPU boost off so the GPU gets more power. Now $700 isn’t likely to work in the long run. Look at the prices the Ally is going for. Also for the way handhelds work, with both models having the same GPU, the one with less CPU cores is actually probably better.Reply -
Notton
If you want to get into drivers...cknobman said:Intel = hard pass
Until consumers can be sure of properly functioning, and optimized drivers, for all versions (especially legacy) of Direct X; buying a handheld like this should be avoided.
Intel graphics drivers are bad, yes. However, it's not like AMD gets a flying pass either. The, undeniably, best graphics driver support is still nvidia. Day-1 game support for AMD graphics is still spotty.
And then there are the system, USB, and WiFi/BT drivers. All of which Intel is superior at, and AMD still needs to work on. -
cknobman
Not sure what decade you are making your assumptions on but one could make a real argument that AMD has better driver support nowadays than Nvidia.Notton said:If you want to get into drivers...
Intel graphics drivers are bad, yes. However, it's not like AMD gets a flying pass either. The, undeniably, best graphics driver support is still nvidia. Day-1 game support for AMD graphics is still spotty.
And then there are the system, USB, and WiFi/BT drivers. All of which Intel is superior at, and AMD still needs to work on.
And on handhelds one of the most critical issues to address is driver support for older games, that are less demanding, which Intel is particularly bad at. -
BloodLust2222 I have a Steam Deck, Asus Ally and a Lenovo Legion. Needless to say, I find the Legion to be the best of the three. Can't wait to waste my wifes money on this one!Reply -
Sluggotg Yep, I will waste my money on one too. I like my Steam deck, Switches, Evercades and Ally. I haven't go the Lenovo yet, but I guess I will have to get one also.Reply