Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime7 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 03:23
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$1,223
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 168
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 502
33% 312 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 38%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$2,142
Gigabyte(1458 3FF6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 74
Parallax 58.5
98% 84.1 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 99.4
82% 102 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$776
78GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 118 168 169 248 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,397
Write 1,281
Mixed 1,145
SusWrite 180
223% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 28.4
95% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 87.4
64% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 100%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$776
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 26 28 24 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 684
Write 23.7
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 24.2
40% 190 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.2
16% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$421
303GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 73 80 88 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 120
Write 135
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 82.1
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$421
375GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 36 42 15 45 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 93.1
Write 53.8
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 36.9
47% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3600C17D4/8GX KHX4000C19D4/8GX KHX3600C17D4/8GX KHX4000C19D4/8GX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 23
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 1.5
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 28 144 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3201 Q32G1WG4
Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $2,137

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $9,797
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback
  翻译: