Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 0.000976562 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200522
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 04:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 147
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 469
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3519) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fb-link HM300/128GB 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2209XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 230 236 206 80 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.9% Above average
Read 254
Write 237
Mixed 212
SusWrite 178
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 25.1
87% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 68.4
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 104
87% 121 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$183
168GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 129 129 129 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 134
Write 122
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 131
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 76%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MXIC 25L8005 1x33GB
1 of 7 slots used
33GB FLASH 33 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 5.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 75 59 60 34.1" 2560 1017 GSM7770 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical X58 Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback
  翻译: