Huawei MACHC-WAX9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHuawei MACHC-WAX9  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI MACHC-WAX9-PCB
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3000 x 2000 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 07:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 142
58% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 303
32% 256 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E83 3E21) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGXA4103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 956
Write 822
Mixed 829
194% 869 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 40.8
153% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 385
299% 418 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.2% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 0G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 21% 33 69 56 60 13.9" 1280 720 TLX1388
Typical MACHC-WAX9 Builds (Compare 577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei MACHC-WAX9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback
  翻译: