Gigabyte GA-B365 HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 HD3  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '24 at 03:36
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$2,127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 275
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 740
75% 607 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$4,129
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 319
Parallax 379
245% 333 fps
MRender 469
Gravity 270
Splatting 215
248% 318 fps
Poor: 182%
This bench: 217%
Great: 232%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
465GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,056
Write 1883
Mixed 1,690
418% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 73.9
252% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 963
731% 994 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
ASolid USB 126GB
31GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 16.5
Mixed 57.8
67% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.1
134% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 22
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 15% 53 215 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DA6 MSI G32C4
Typical GA-B365 HD3 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $2,577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback
  翻译: