Average Bench: 75.7% (319th of 1468)

Based on 159,077 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F82 Model: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core Processor

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

Good average bench

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X averaged 24.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Single Core Speed 113Pts
Avg. Memory Latency 75.3Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is 28%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Speed 708Pts
Avg. Multi Core Speed 1,096Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 159,077 samples)
Min Avg Max
64.6 Memory 75.3 86.7
71.7 1-Core 113 128
143 2-Core 219 254
75.5% 136 Pts
Min Avg Max
292 4-Core 409 499
477 8-Core 708 911
67.6% 558 Pts
Min Avg Max
651 64-Core 1,096 1,276
67.8% 1,096 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 911
84% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,266
78% 1,266 Pts
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 880
83% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 788
76% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,222
76% 1,222 Pts
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 73.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 740
71% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,169
72% 1,169 Pts
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 75.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 666
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
159,077 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,929,354 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $330 @ launch in Apr '18
EbayUS $1503 mins $1,168USDHKD = 7.79
AmazonUS $18919 mins $1,472USDHKD = 7.79
Send price feedback
Typical Ryzen 7 2700X Builds (Compare 24,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $1,052

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $4,362

Popular Ryzen 7 2700X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Based on the new 12 nm "Pinnacle Ridge" silicon with higher clock speeds...

Added 6 years ago.

Disliked

14 hrs ago.

Comment 

And we're off.... the 8700K at its current price-point is the champ it needs to beat. To my view, if they want to take a bite out of the gamer market, it's going to need to get a lot closer to the Intel i7s' single- and quad-core performance, if it's only going to be fifty bucks or so less. If the multi-core performance can sustain itself well above the i7, at a lower cost, while still being speedy at desktop apps, it will be the go-to chip for content producers: audio and video rendering, etc. But here's a huge market: amateur or freelance content creators who only have a single all-purpose machine. I wonder how many might not have gone for a Ryzen 1k thinking it would nerf their gaming or general-purpose use? The 2k line could disrupt that if they've done it right.—Apr '18

Comment 

Buggy and slow, this processor has given me headaches over the past few years—Nov '23


Liked

6 months ago.

Comment 

Poor gaming performance.—Jan '21


Excellent

2 days ago.

Comment 

marketing garbage caught a lot of users off guard.—Mar '22


Good

24 months ago.

Utterly insane value for its money $240 new for a 8/16t decent IPC cpu is mental


Excellent

11 months ago.

Much better then i7-6700k , 8 cores on 4Ghz vs 4 cores on 4Ghz is pretty good


Excellent

3 months ago.

So much power that can be unlocked with this CPU is amazing.


Terrible

2 years ago.

Comment 

high latency - big gaming bottleneck. —Mar '22


Excellent

2 years ago.

Comment 

marketing garbage, always has been.—Jan '21


Good

4 years ago.

Very good multi core performance. Performance per watt is not too bad. Single core performance is its main downside. However, it makes a pretty good high end build for a good price, personally I think it beats out the i7-8700k.


Good

6 years ago.


Good

3 years ago.

AMD is the best price performance product for sure.


Excellent

13 months ago.

Good for gaming, streaming and workstation workloads - CAD etc.


Good

4 years ago.

Very powerful cpu, I love it, runs a little hot on simple tasks. Still worth buying for the price.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Ryzen 7 2700X owners listen up; stop "overclocking" this CPU to 4.1-4.2 GHz. Did you happen to notice on the box that it has a 4.3 GHz boost speed? You might be getting better overall multi-core (all-core) performance, particularly if you don't have the greatest cooling solution, but you're hurting your single-core performance, which may also be hurting your performance in games. This CPU is smarter than you are. With 2nd gen Ryzen (Zen+), AMD has improved SenseMI with Extended Frequency Range (XFR) 2 and Precision Boost (PB) 2 having more aggressive algorithms that will boost more cores to higher frequencies if you keep it cool (AMD says 60°C or below is best, which can be very difficult to achieve). In fact, that 4.3 GHz printed on the box is actually more like 4.35 GHz and it will definitely boost to that speed on individual cores, even using the stock cooler (which is pretty decent). That is, of course, if you don't do a locked-in, manual, all-core "overclock" because you're unlikely to achieve 4.3-4.35 GHz. If you really feel like you need to overclock, do a PBO overclock so that you can still get those high single-core speeds. The only exception to this might be for content creators/rendering workloads or running all-core benchmarks like Cinebench because the CPU will likely never boost itself as high as you might be able to get it on all cores due to its built-in temperature thresholds via SenseMI.

Info  cpu.userbenchmark.com/...

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Core i7-6900K

Info  cpu.userbenchmark.com/...

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Core i7-7820X

Info  www.amd.com/...

AMD's SenseMI Technology Overview


Excellent

6 years ago.

awesome performer, best deal


Excellent

4 years ago.

The first lineup of processor that murdered intel in cold blood.


Excellent

5 years ago.

AMAZING!!!


Excellent

6 years ago.

8 Cores 16 Threads @ 4Ghz at less than $300!


Good

5 years ago.

Good performance vs budget


Excellent

5 years ago.

This CPU is very powerful featuring 8 cores and 16 threads and the ability of overclocking. This CPU has the strength to just about do all your work, from everyday gaming to everyday workstation. It is priced very well for such a powerful CPU that will make such a powerful impact on your computer. To harness the full capability of this CPU, it would be most preferred to be paired with a strong GPU, resulting in no bottleneck and maximum capability. With the right build this CPU can be all a person would ever need, whether you plan to overclock it or not, or use the stock cooler or not, it will still be a very dynamic CPU.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Playing Subnautica at maximum settings with a 1070 Ti, and the CPU's maximum load across all cores was 33%. That leaves a lot of wiggle room for OBS, and other tasks on the second monitor.


Terrible

5 years ago.

Worse Multi and Single Core scores.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Very nice for the price. 8 cores and 16 threads of true power. I pushed my 2700x to 1913 on cinebench.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Bye Bye Intel. At this price can't beat it.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Bit jumpy on voltages but stays pretty much at 4000mhz on all cores. No need to overclock it as you won't see much of an improvement. Stock cooler not good enough to keep up while gaming in ultra settings.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Exceptional price-performance. If you find it for less than $160 in 2020 -- snap it up. Close to Ryzen 5 3600 in performance and the more cores crush streaming. Included CPU cooler is GREAT - with RGB and everything. Thanks for reading.


Good

6 years ago.

Ryzen has improved the Memory Latency and the Overclock Potential in the second gen of Ryzen (Zen+) but still a little bit behind the 8700K, but keep in mind that you will get a 8Core CPU + one beautiful Stock Cooler which its much better for non-Gamers; Ryzen Gaming Is Good But Not Perfect, for example, u will get 140FPS with Ryzen when 8700K gives you 155FPS, I personally Use 1700X for Gaming and its very good but not Perfect, keep in mind.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Paired with a GTX1080 this is a beast, great fps in 4k gaming and 4k video editing. Great value for money and includes a Wraith cooler that will cope with most scenarios when overclocked to ~4.1GHz maximum.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Using one right now, and I must say that the cooler is the only bad part of the whole package. The processor overclocks acceptably with the stock cooler under even heavy loads. Destroys video editing or photo editing. Great buy even if only used in gaming, but better used for both of the worlds, gaming and editing or work related.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Great CPU for a great price


Excellent

5 years ago.

Excellent OCing


Excellent

3 years ago.

Very good amount of cores for gaming and simple productivity. Could happily have a few extra cores/threads for those of us doing heavy multitasking while gaming.


Excellent

6 years ago.

Amazing stock cooler with an amazing processor. oh wait it's the other way around.


Excellent

6 years ago.

solid performance for both gaming and productivity


Excellent

5 years ago.

Exceptional performance at reasonable price under Linux as well as Win10


Excellent

5 years ago.

Been using it in my workstation for a few months now. Those 8 cores are working hard to earn their 5 stars. Crushes any task I throw at it.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Have yoused it for a week now. its = to a my old i7 4790k @ 4,8ghz and cahe @ 4,7ghz in gamming. but for evry ting else it 100% better


Excellent

5 years ago.

Great gaming processor, great cooler, great price.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Great performance for the money


Good

4 years ago.

Best zen+ cpu and a very good budget 8 core 16 thread cpu. Comes with wraith prism which is really good at cooling this cpu if little bit more noise isn't a problem for you. Even tho its good, ryzen 5 3600 is a better cpu. It uses less power for the same performance, you can find ryzen 5 3600 for cheaper and use it with much cheaper motherboard.


Good

6 years ago.

Finally got some competition


Poor

6 years ago.

Horribly disappointing. The multi-core gains over the 8700K are unimpressive, minimal - and for it you sacrifice a huge amount of more basic performance. If their target market was content creators, they've failed. Anyone who doesn't have a dedicated production machine - freelancers and other small-business creators - will have one mutlipurpose machine. This chip's the same price as the 8700K so there's not even the advantage of saving your budget. For these piddly multi-core gains, which will make rendering and production *slightly* faster, you have a slower desktop, gaming machine, everything else. Ugh. Fail.


Excellent

6 years ago.

Best cpu overall. Intel at 8 cores is way over priced for the marginal increase in speed at the cost of a lot of heat. 2700x for life.


Excellent

6 years ago.

Fastest CPU i have ever owned


Excellent

5 years ago.

New upgrade for me. Loving it.


Excellent

5 years ago.

I was so excited to socket my Anniversary edition into my pc, that I forgot to uninstall all AMD drivers, spent all night triggering bluescreens while attempting to uninstall these drivers. Not gonna blame AMD for my own mistake of leaving old chipset drivers from my R7 1800X on my pc. Can't wait to benchmark it. 4ghz all core turbo on 33°C idle in Taskmanager is already looking rock solid, and that's while I was fixing this mess.


Excellent

5 years ago.

This processor is a monster. Once did a stress test by opening all 8 of my Adobe CC apps I use at the same time, and it loaded them all in less than 40 seconds using only 30% of my 32GB of RAM. Sure, the i7 and i9 are technically better, but this this is an absurdly powerful processor for photography and 1080p video.


Excellent

6 years ago.

It has more power than anybody will ever need..Beats 8700K in multi-core performance!


Excellent

6 years ago.

Топовый проц по соотношению цена производительность


Excellent

5 years ago.

Awesome CPU. Precision Boost Overdrive makes for amazing gaming performance, and with its 8 cores + 16 threads it can handle any video rendering/encoding that I do as a content creator with ease.


Excellent

5 years ago.

waw


Excellent

4 years ago.

This is now my processor actually and the best choice and investment in my life.


Excellent

5 years ago.

AMDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD


Excellent

5 years ago.

It is awsome!


Excellent

5 years ago.

i mean, come on how cheap it is and as long as u have decent ram, ezy overclock speed.


Excellent

5 years ago.

best cpu so far


Excellent

4 years ago.

lo mejor :D


Your
opinion?
1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback
  翻译: