Who Gets to Be a Professor? A Global Look at Academic Promotion
As Michael Backes puts it: Getting published in Nature about your research is great - but collaborating with colleagues from across disciplines and continents to challenge how academic careers are assessed? That’s next level.
Michael, our Leadership Academy alumnus, is part of the Global Young Academy Scientific Excellence WG that examined who gets promoted to full professor across 121 countries.
➡️ Their study, published in Nature Portfolio, reveals that in policies affecting around three-quarters of researchers worldwide, citation counts aren’t even explicitly mentioned as a factor in academic promotion.
Instead, career paths are shaped by national and institutional policies that often reinforce rigid expectations rather than embracing the diversity of research careers.
✅ Here are some results:
➡️ Research output? 97% of policies assess it, but many rely on publication counts rather than deeper qualitative evaluation.
➡️ Teaching & mentoring? Teaching is included in 93% of cases, but mentoring - despite its importance in shaping future researchers - is considered in 75% of policies.
➡️ National vs. institutional differences? National policies lean more on metrics and journal indexing, while universities often consider mentoring, interdisciplinary work, and broader contributions.
➡️ Studies show that higher-income countries often prioritize qualitative measures like visibility and engagement, whereas many lower- and middle-income countries rely more on citation-based metrics—potentially reinforcing systemic inequities.
Why does this matter?
Academia is built on the idea of excellence, but this study highlights how promotion criteria don’t always reflect what makes a great researcher. Instead, rigid expectations, outdated metrics, and regional disparities shape careers in ways that may not actually serve research or society.
📖 Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/eV9fFgf2
Major kudos to all the co-authors!
❓ Who gets recognized, who gets promoted, and how do we define success in academia? What’s your take - should academic promotion criteria be more flexible?