Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add boolean change and T flip-flop evaluatable #2072

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 8, 2020

Conversation

Wibble199
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds two new evaluatables:

  • A boolean change detector that works similarly to the numeric change detector. Will output a true signal on the frame that the child evaluatable value changes. Can be configured to only output when the new value is true or when the new value is false.
  • A toggle flip-flop whose state changes every frame that the input evaluatable is true.

The existing "Flip-Flop" (Boolean_Latch) has been renamed to "Flip-Flop (Set-Reset)" (Boolean_FlipFlopSR) to clarify the type of latch it behaves as.

…es the state if that boolean is true.

Renamed `Boolean_Latch` to `Boolean_FlipFlopSR`.
@Wibble199 Wibble199 changed the base branch from master to dev June 6, 2020 21:23
public Boolean_FlipFlopT(Evaluatable<bool> toggle) => Toggle = toggle;

protected override bool Execute(IGameState gameState) {
if (Toggle.Evaluate(gameState))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should only toggle if it got false since last toggle. I know you can "fix" it with the boolean change detector but I still think this change should be done. Everyone that worked with graphical programming before will expect it works like that.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the current approach makes the most sense and is the most flexible. I don't consider adding a change detector to be a 'fix', for both options to be available, you'd need to add something one way or the other. This way it's more clear what each evaluatable does.

@diogotr7 diogotr7 merged commit 05c5d3c into antonpup:dev Jun 8, 2020
@Wibble199 Wibble199 deleted the feature/more-evaluatables branch June 8, 2020 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
  翻译: