Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
thats why i bought it, yes, the quality is very good, when i open my ``Raytracing`´ on max i am playing with +33 fps
I have deep mixed feelings about these remakes. If devs remake a game that already has a good story, well defined mechanics, and audience that adored the primary iteration then the mission is simple: Upgrade the resolutions, the remake must be faithful to the original story, and provide simple modern expectations like resolutions for modern monitor setups and high freq. monitors allowing the player to adjust parameters for >60Hz or >120Hz.
tldr: the work is 90% done before the remake, so any failures show the dev team to be 'weak'. Yeah this is the symptom of modern devs and studios. Those idiots at kotaku don't even play the game before the review.