Coram AI’s Post

View organization page for Coram AI, graphic

5,718 followers

Weigh in on a debate for us: Simply put, where in the video surveillance system architecture should the the AI or "brains" of the camera reside? There are two main architectures: – In-Camera AI: The AI is inside the camera, near the imaging sensor. – Centralized AI: The AI is in a central video recorder or processing unit, with the camera only capturing data and sending it to the central unit. When the AI is inside the camera, you don’t need a central server. This setup is neat and has its pros. However, you are locked into that camera provider ecosystem and hardware, limiting flexibility. On the other hand, having the AI in a central server means the camera's job is just to capture data and send it to the central unit. This method works with any camera type, making it easier to integrate different kinds of cameras like thermal, PTZ, or multi-sensor cameras. Upgrading to advanced AI capabilities is also simpler with a centralized approach — replacing a server only takes like 10-20 minutes. One significant consideration is future-proofing. AI technology evolves rapidly. In-camera AI can quickly become outdated, much like using an old smartphone. With centralized AI, you can continuously upgrade and leverage powerful GPUs for advanced algorithms without replacing physical cameras. This approach ensures you stay current with the latest advancements, leading to better performance, cost savings, and enhanced security. Are we biased? Yeah, probably. The one thing we can all agree on is that as AI becomes more integral to operations, every organization needs to adopt an AI-first mindset to save time, reduce costs, and enhance safety. Being stuck with outdated technology will certainly hinder progress.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics