Council of Europe’s Post

Opportunity

📖 Read the book edited by Kelley Loper, international advisory board member of Centre for Comparative and Public Law at the University of Hong Kong at HKU Law, analyzing the equal citizenship claims of women and sexual and gender diverse people across several Asian jurisdictions. She also introduces the situation of Hong Kong in Chapter 4. Full text: https://lnkd.in/gUTNzxAr

Attention researchers and gender equality advocates! The Iran Gender-Responsive Budgeting Forum calls for insightful papers that scrutinize the impact of Iranian policies on women and men. Papers can be written either in Persian or English. This is a unique opportunity to contribute your research and analysis to a critical dialogue on gender budgeting in Iran. Whether your expertise lies in the economic implications of gender segregation, the distribution of labor, or the costs and benefits of public policies from a gender perspective, your voice is needed. Topics range from monetary policy and national budget allocation impacts to the economic consequences of gender-based violence and beyond. If you have a different gender-related subject, the IRAN GRB Forum encourages you to bring it forward. IRAN GRB Forum seeks contributions from those with a deep understanding of Iran's socio-economic context, possessing the expertise to explore these issues critically and propose meaningful solutions. For detailed information on the call, terms of reference, and how to apply, please visit their website:https://lnkd.in/dkJSYPgE

[Call for Inputs] The Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria supports the call for inputs by the United Nations Independent Expert (IE) on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), for a thematic report on electoral participation and sexual orientation and gender identity. The purpose of the call is to seek inputs for incorporation into a report on the obstacles to full and meaningful participation in electoral processes that individuals face, linked to their real or perceived sexual orientation and gender identity. The report will be presented at the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly in November 2024, by the current IE SOGI, Graeme Reid. The deadline to provide submissions to the Call for Inputs is 25 April 2024. Inputs should be sent by email to hrc-ie-sogi@un.org in Word or PDF format and may be submitted in English, French or Spanish. Submissions from civil society organisations, governments, national human rights institutions, academics, and individuals with relevant lived experiences are welcome. Access the guidelines on the submission of inputs using the link below 🔽 https://lnkd.in/dg8wyQys

Last year, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its OP v Commune d'Ans judgment. Where the previous headscarf cases concerned private enterprises, OP v Commune d'Ans differed in that it originated from a public administration. Consequently, the State neutrality argument - as opposed to the freedom to conduct a business - played a significant role in the judgment. The State neutrality argument is also of constitutional importance for some Member States. In my case note in the Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, I argue that while the CJEU managed to accommodate different iterations of the State neutrality principle by introducing a margin of discretion for diverse neutrality policies, it fell short in safeguarding the general framework for equal treatment. Specifically, the judgment disregarded how the conceptualisation of State neutrality encompasses more than the relationship between State and religion as it is also shaped by, and therefore directly impacts, gender and racial equality. You can access the case note here (open access): https://lnkd.in/esWceX6y or https://lnkd.in/etgvMBHh

📚 Exciting News: Publication Announcement 📚 I am thrilled to share that my paper titled "Criminal Justice System And Gender Neutrality: A Critical Assessment Of How The Indian Criminal Justice System Treats Genders Equally In Terms Of Arrest, Trial, And Incarceration" has been published in the esteemed Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, Volume VI Issue I. 🔍 Overview: In this comprehensive study, I delve into the intricate facets of the Indian Criminal Justice System, critically evaluating its approach toward gender neutrality. By meticulously examining the arrest, trial, and incarceration processes, I aim to shed light on the system's effectiveness in treating genders equitably. 💡 Key Highlights: - Unpacking the existing legal framework addressing gender neutrality. - Analyzing real-world cases to assess the practical application of these legal provisions. - Identifying potential gaps and challenges in ensuring equal treatment for all genders. 🌐 Significance: Understanding how our criminal justice system navigates the complexities of gender is crucial for fostering a fair and just society. This paper contributes to the ongoing dialogue on gender equality, providing valuable insights that can inform policy decisions and legal reforms. 📖 How to Access: The full paper is available in the latest issue of the Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research. I invite scholars, legal professionals, and enthusiasts to explore this work and engage in discussions surrounding the critical intersection of gender and criminal justice. (https://lnkd.in/dJ4f7AuV) 🙏 Acknowledgments: I thank the Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research for providing a platform to share this research—special thanks to my mentors, colleagues, and collaborators of Lawctopus and Ms. Maansi Mankotia who supported me throughout this scholarly journey. Let's continue advancing the conversation on gender equality within the criminal justice system. Feel free to reach out for further discussions, feedback, or collaborative opportunities. #GenderNeutrality #CriminalJusticeSystem #LegalResearch #GenderEquality #Publication #LawAndSociety #ResearchPaper #IndianLegalSystem

I am excited to share my latest article published in the Latin American Journal of Human Rights, titled "The Legal Gender Asymmetry in the Decisions of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation in Mexico." In this piece, I explore the concept of gender legal asymmetry, highlighting how gender stereotypes are embedded in the legal practice in Mexico. The article examines the principles of equality and non-discrimination under International Human Rights Law (IHRL), with a focus on jurisprudence from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the United Nations Committees, including the CEDAW Committee. Through an analysis of gender-related rulings by the Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, I propose that the Court integrate this concept to promote both formal and substantive equality in constitutional interpretation. https://lnkd.in/dCjJKUSx

OSCE (Organzation for Security and Co-operation in Europe) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) 10 January 2024 (All day) - 30 April 2024 (All day), Warsaw Intensive training for change-makers on gender audits and gender action plans: Tools for institutional transformation of political parties #osce #humanrights

Today, MPG's director, Isabelle Chopin, addressed the MEPs of the LIBE Committee in a workshop session "The EU as a Union of Equality?". In her intervention, she pointed out key issues that have been observed by the European Network of Legal Experts in the field of gender equality and non-discrimination, of which she is the Specialist Coordinator in Non-Discrimination Law. “We welcome the work and actions taken by the European Commission. A lot has been achieved, the situation has changed drastically over the past 30 years, and I am very happy to have been part of this journey for all these years, but I am afraid I am going to focus on the gaps and the problematic areas, without indeed undermining all the progress that has been made since 2000.” “In theory the two non-discrimination directives are well transposed, and the vast majority of Member States provide further protection on the national level even if some issues regarding interpretation and definition still remain to be clarified. The practice though remains sometimes difficult and the vast majority of experts highlight as the main problematic areas: the lack of case law, sometimes still the lack of knowledge, understanding and awareness regarding anti-discrimination law, access to justice and the inadequate sanctions.” “How could a legislation be properly implemented if victims have difficulties in accessing justice? This is translated by the lack of awareness (training seems to be necessary for the judiciary, lawyers, police…etc.), the length of judicial proceedings, the scarce or non-existent legal aid and assistance to victims, the legal costs, the difficult legal standing for organisations, the functioning of Equality Bodies and more important the fact that sanctions are not as required by both Directives proportionate, effective and dissuasive.” Rewatch her address and find publications from the European Network of Legal Experts in the field of gender equality and non-discrimination here: https://bit.ly/49X4jUI

Review of International Studies has been at the forefront of conversations about gender and feminist analysis in International Relations. At the UN, October is the month when leaders focus on the Women, Peace, and Security Agenda after resolution 1325 was passed in October 2000. On our website, we have a special collection of pieces that highlight cutting edge on gender and feminism. These interventions showcase the work of emerging and established scholars, all of whom have pushed the boundaries of who and what counts in and as global politics. As these pieces demonstrate, gender and feminist analysis has been central in recasting questions of power, structure and agency in the study of world politics more broadly. https://lnkd.in/eXZCy3z8