Defense Information Systems Agency’s Post

How would a future war differ from past conflicts? According to United States Marine Corps Col. Jared Voneida, DISA Pacific commander, in the past we were able to get up to speed after the conflict started. If a war with a near-peer or true-peer adversary arose, we wouldn't have that luxury. That's why we work around the clock, across the world to strengthen our posture, improve our network, and maintain deterrence in alignment with the #NationalDefenseStrategy. ⬇️ Learn more in this clip from AFCEA International #TechNetCyber.

Lance Spencer

Market Driver | Game Changer | Global Ops | Senior Military Officer & Fortune 9 Executive | Air Force Cyber Hall of Fame selectee | AT&T Diamond Club

3mo

Col Voneida is spot on and he and I have discussed this. In addition, DoD will need instant access to commercial capacity and resiliency, but that framework is not in place. DoD needs to work hand in hand with commercial providers to project needs so capability is in place and available when a conflict starts. DoD also needs a highly agile and flexible express procurement vehicle to rapidly turn up commercial capabilities. And lastly DoD to needs to exercise this with commercial providers represented so it’s a truly operational and responsive capability. I was a multi-theater AFFOR/A6 so I’m speaking both from my commercial provider and theater operator experience.

Brian Banks

Solutions Architect | Retired Marine

3mo

Col V understands the need to stay ahead of our adversaries but does the POM cycle?

Robert O. Paiva

Providing Timely Solutions to Complex Scenarios

3mo

Well from my point of view, our enemies are already inside the wire here domestically and the conflicts “over there” appear more to be designed distraction than a theater of real conflict. We still seem to be so damned impressed with ourselves, our innovation and our mobilities that we’re blind to the changing battlefield selection. I’m certain the Colonel is aware of the Chinese doctrine “Unrestricted Warfare.” Kinetic warfare by our peer and near-peer adversaries is not their primary objective when it comes to the U.S. military. The next war is already underway and it’s progressing very well for our adversaries while we continue to fret over how technology dominant we appear on a battlefield that may never come.

The fascination with networks and information on the battle field is interesting. But it fails to address the real challenge that every maneuver-based military since Napoleon has faced: the logistics of supporting a forward deployed force fighting on foreign soil. In Afghanistan, U.S. forces in the field were burning thru batteries, fuel and potable water faster than ammunition. Technology requires power and personnel require food & water. Convoys were asked to leave the ammo behind and pack additional water, fuel and batteries to support our technology heavy forces in the field. The next “revolution in military affairs” is going to be figuring out how to cut the petroleum noose to free up maneuver forces with energy independence and providing them the means to make fresh water without relying on long, vulnerable resupply lines.

Dee Daugherty

Leaders in Full Service Manufacturing!

3mo

Time on Target. As an industrial college alum and old soldier, I truly believe that the pressure is on for the faculty, staff and students of this year‘s Eisenhower School. DOD and the US organic industrial base must rapidly get on the left side of the innovation curve with a heightened focus on velocity to market, superior quality and operational security. Needless to say, the threat of contested logistics domestically and abroad is real. Unchecked immigration has allowed our enemies to be inside the wire. Lastly, we lack sufficient strategic lift to support our current national military objectives. Much to be solved. Quickly…

tony Iraqi

Retired 🙏☀️😎

3mo

Future war? Nobody wants to join the military. If we are talking about a future war we're gonna need the draft.

Thomas Augustine

Cyber Risk to Mission (CRtM) at NAVWAR

3mo

"in theatre" seems quaint. It has that "over there", "somewhere else", "safe to go to the NFL game" connotation. I suggested San Diego naval bases have a increased risk from the "secure border", as Sec. Mayorkas tells us, and was told that was "unprofessional and political". Hopefully all those videos from JACUMBA HOT SPRINGS were "cheapfakes".

Curtis Bussiere

Security transportation Officer

3mo

When I was younger, I always thought quicksand was going to be a bigger problem in my life but now with a 27 year military career behind me and having served in Iraq and seeing the chaos that that just one improvised, explosive device causes within a square mile on peoples nerves, I can’t imagine what constant bombardment from artillery would do to the Integrity of the military decision making process and soldiers continuity. Add to the equation the use of drones, the limitations that rule of war put on soldiers being able to do the brutal things they need to do to win, the medias obsession with collateral damage and playing footage of dead civilians would have the citizens in an uncontrollable uproar. It is this retired PSYOP soldiers opinion that we’re going to need a considerable amount of significant emotional events in order for us to ever win conventional war.

Patrick Mahoney

Customer Obsessed | Marine Corps Veteran

3mo

This is spot on. Col Jared Voneida has been driving network optimization and security for years now demonstrating the best network is one that is on today and ready for tomorrow.

Thierry SOUDET

Chargé de mission "pilotage opérationnel - Ressources internes - Conduite du changement" chez Secrétariat général à l'administration - Ministère des Armées

3mo

Le réseau, c'est bien. Mais l'important est ce qu'on y met et à quelle vitesse. Hier la victoire allait au plus puissant. Elle va aujourd'hui au plus rapide, i.e. celui qui a le battlerythm le plus court. Le réseau y participe mais ne fait pas tout : l'initiative et la subsidiarité sont des facteurs tout aussi puissants.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics