Environmental Accounting Services’ Post

Whether it is governments through regulation, or the food and fibre supply chain setting science-based targets, the agriculture sector is under pressure as critical climate change mitigation milestones approach. We read with interest this past week that Denmark may become the first country to tax agricultural emissions, as it aims to reduce emissions by 70% across all sectors by 2030. With agriculture being a major source of emissions in Denmark, a tax of 120 kroner (NZD$28) per tonne of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock is set to be introduced. On average, each Danish cow emits about 5.6 tonnes CO₂e annually, which will now cost around NZD$150-160 per year per cow. This tax is expected to reduce the country’s CO₂e emissions by approximately 1.8 million tonnes by 2030. The revenue from these taxes will be dedicated to protecting nature, restoring ecosystems, and creating forests and wetlands through a “Green Area Fund.” Additionally, the Danish government is providing €5.3 billion (NZD$9.3 billion) to reforest 250,000 hectares of agricultural land by 2045 and set aside 140,000 hectares of lowland by 2030. Some funds will also go towards buying back certain farms to reduce nitrogen emissions. We remain interested to see how other countries will address food and fibre emissions. Will they opt for regulation or rely on market solutions? What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments. https://lnkd.in/earcKFn8

Belching livestock to incur green levy in Denmark from 2030

Belching livestock to incur green levy in Denmark from 2030

theguardian.com

Mark A.

Farmer at Westridge Farm, Deep thinking, Systems thinking, 🇳🇿 Adopting Regenerative Farming systems for soil, plant, animal & world health.

3mo

The next step will be that the farmers will now have to invoice the government for carbon cycled throughout and sequestered into their biological land based systems, only then will the government realise they just wasted vast amounts of time and money on biogenic methane propaganda and could have focused on energy and ecosystems and achieved greater emissions reductions in long lived accumulative emissions.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics