Forward Party’s Post

While President Trump didn’t have an electoral landslide (he received under 50% of the popular vote), he is certainly a representative of change, and it’s why people voted for him at the ballot box. President Trump is divisive; change is divisive. It’s important that we view his actions through the lens of how well it reflects the desires of Americans. Pres. Trump is going to take many divisive stances, and drive towards many divisive policies. Let’s not forget that that’s what the electorate sent him back to the White House to do. When analyzing his actions, we need to view it through that lens. Is he improving the economic lives of Americans? If he takes action to do so, or ignores action that would, then we should make that case to the American people. Forward can be the better alternative—the group that wants to improve Americans’ lives without the hateful rhetoric, cronyism, and corruption of the existing parties.

Mitch Macholz, MBA

MBA Graduate, University at Buffalo

2mo

Compared to recent elections? Trump won 49.8% of the vote, Kamala won 48.3% despite the sheer #’s advantage of dense cities. He literally won every swing state and took the Senate and the House. When the Democrats were in that similar situation post 2020 election, they didn’t deliver on their promises. “Sinema and Manchin spoiled it” I’m still a fan of Andrew Yang’s platform but the third party doesn’t seem like a viable move given winner take all. If one side of the political aisle will deliver on promises and the other will not then there isn’t much choice.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics