George Mickiewicz’s Post

This Earth Day, I am excited to share my recent Comment about state corporate climate disclosure laws, which was featured on the Environmental Law Institute's website this month. This Comment examines California's Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) under the compelled speech doctrine of the First Amendment. If you are interested, you can access the full article here:

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to dismantle the #Chevron deference marks a pivotal shift in the landscape of climate and environmental regulation in the United States. This decades-old precedent allowed federal agencies to interpret laws based on their expertise and scientific evidence, significantly shaping the nation’s regulatory framework. Although not immediately clear, the fallout from this decision is expected to open the floodgates for legal challenges against regulations by key agencies like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of the Interior, both crucial players in the fight against climate change. ➡ https://lnkd.in/ehcfZ5bS Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Southern Environmental Law Center Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Sierra Club #climatechange #scotus

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast:

When it comes to environmental law and regulations, the only question now remaining is when—and not if—the courts will be asked to resolve contentious issues, says Crowell & Moring’s Elizabeth Dawson. Read more in the #LitigationForecast: