Grounded World’s Post

In the The Australia Institute article below, I address topics surrounding textiles circularity in Australia and some of the critical things we need for a holistic, circular textiles system. Last week the Minister for Environment and Water, The Hon. Tanya Plibersek announced the commencement of Seamless operations and reinforced her support for the initiative. With a mission to make Australian clothing circular by 2030, Seamless scheme addresses the issue of over 200,000 tonnes of waste ending up in Australian landfill annually. Meanwhile, more than 100,000 tonnes of textile waste are shipped overseas in the name of charity, providing so called ‘quality clothing’, and providing jobs in the used clothing trade in other countries. These claims sit in the intersection between greenwashing and social washing. Most clothes are made of plastic, which has toxic chemicals. Exporting textiles increases emissions, fills up landfills in other countries, pollutes land and oceans and also hampers the ability for growth of local textiles industry in those countries, where better-quality jobs could be created. We can no longer pretend exporting waste – of any kind – is a virtuous service bestowed upon the Global South. Neither can we continue to pretend that this waste does not exist because we’ve made it some else’s problem. Exporting waste that will end up in landfill elsewhere is still a linear system and not a circular one. Moreover, in a recent statement about an incident involving the illegal export of used tyres, DCCEEW has said: “The Australian Government is committed to better protecting the environment both domestically and overseas and Australia’s waste export restrictions, including on tyres, play a crucial role in this protection.” On July 1, Seamless will go ahead with the planned 4-cent levy that members pay for each garment placed on the Australian market. Our textiles waste report and some leading industry experts have purported that we actually need a 50-cent levy on each garment to carry out the operations that create clothing circularity, particularly by 2030. There’s speculation that the levy may be raised in the future. We want Seamless to succeed and the manifestation of full clothing circularity to come to fruition but the right factors need to be in place. History is littered with similar circular economy programs in Australia that, although started with good intentions, ultimately failed: Redcycle (recycling of soft plastics), the National Television and Computer Scheme, the Home Battery Scheme, and the list goes on. Regardless of what other countries are doing, Australia is capable of being a global leader in circular and sustainable textile policies and could act as a model for other countries to emulate. More details in the article below.

In the The Australia Institute article below, I address topics surrounding textiles circularity in Australia and some of the critical things we need for a holistic, circular textiles system. Last week the Minister for Environment and Water, The Hon. Tanya Plibersek announced the commencement of Seamless operations and reinforced her support for the initiative. With a mission to make Australian clothing circular by 2030, Seamless scheme addresses the issue of over 200,000 tonnes of waste ending up in Australian landfill annually. Meanwhile, more than 100,000 tonnes of textile waste are shipped overseas in the name of charity, providing so called ‘quality clothing’, and providing jobs in the used clothing trade in other countries. These claims sit in the intersection between greenwashing and social washing. Most clothes are made of plastic, which has toxic chemicals. Exporting textiles increases emissions, fills up landfills in other countries, pollutes land and oceans and also hampers the ability for growth of local textiles industry in those countries, where better-quality jobs could be created. We can no longer pretend exporting waste – of any kind – is a virtuous service bestowed upon the Global South. Neither can we continue to pretend that this waste does not exist because we’ve made it some else’s problem. Exporting waste that will end up in landfill elsewhere is still a linear system and not a circular one. Moreover, in a recent statement about an incident involving the illegal export of used tyres, DCCEEW has said: “The Australian Government is committed to better protecting the environment both domestically and overseas and Australia’s waste export restrictions, including on tyres, play a crucial role in this protection.” On July 1, Seamless will go ahead with the planned 4-cent levy that members pay for each garment placed on the Australian market. Our textiles waste report and some leading industry experts have purported that we actually need a 50-cent levy on each garment to carry out the operations that create clothing circularity, particularly by 2030. There’s speculation that the levy may be raised in the future. We want Seamless to succeed and the manifestation of full clothing circularity to come to fruition but the right factors need to be in place. History is littered with similar circular economy programs in Australia that, although started with good intentions, ultimately failed: Redcycle (recycling of soft plastics), the National Television and Computer Scheme, the Home Battery Scheme, and the list goes on. Regardless of what other countries are doing, Australia is capable of being a global leader in circular and sustainable textile policies and could act as a model for other countries to emulate. More details in the article below.

Textile waste recycling: what does the fate of Renewcell and Infinited Fiber Company tell us? The fashion industry just got hit with some pretty important news about textile waste recycling in the last weeks. 👉 First, textile-to-textile (T2T) recycler Infinited Fiber Company in Finland announced that it is laying off staff to “adjust the company’s cost structure and operations” due to the failure to find more financing. 👉 Second, the Swedish recycler Renewcell went bankrupt, knocking another leading T2T recycler off the map. Both companies were operating far under production capacity. These events should be a shock to the fashion industry as the two firms were seen as leaders in textile recycling technology and saviors of the fashion industry. H&M was an investor in both companies and Inditex (ZARA SA) pledged to buy €100M in material from them. The mantra of the fast fashion industry has always been that “closed loop” T2T recycling will solve the textile waste problem. What went wrong? Various articles point out a variety of reasons for the failures, from the high cost of such recycled material vs. low cost of virgin textiles to the mismatch of the recycled pulp to clothing production machines in Asia, to lack of support from governments. (it's misleading as EIB and other gov. inst. extensively supported these companies). It is important to mention that both H&M and Inditex also had pre-signed contracts with both companies to buy their recycled textile materials and apparently backed out of the deals. So something clearly has gone wrong here. Even if the companies had succeeded, the impact on the 12 million tons of textile waste per year in Europe would have been less than 1%. 👉 First, Renewcell plant capacity was planned at 60,000 tons/year and Infinited Fiber Company 30,000 tons/year. 👉 Second, they only recycle cellulose-based waste, not synthetic materials, which is about 70% of all textile waste. ⚠ The answer is that clothing retailers and governments must stop their wishful thinking and realize that T2T recycling is not the answer to the problem. That is due to the complexity of the industry and the clothing itself, where complete T2T recycling is not that easy. However, it is too little, too late, and something else must be done. ❗ That is why it's time for clothing retailers and governments to think out of the box about what else can be done with 92 million tons of textile waste yearly! ♻ This is where companies like Greenful Group step in with a scalable business model that uses textile waste in very high volumes to manufacture sustainable construction materials that are 100% eco-friendly and low CO2. 👍 So there is still hope on the horizon if clothing retailers and governments get out of their narrow mindset for a complete “closed loop” solution and start thinking about other possible solutions. Otherwise, we will all be buried under the mountains of textile waste. #textile2textile #textilerecycling #textilewaste

Textile waste recycling: what does the fate of Renewcell and Infinited Fiber Company tell us? The fashion industry just got hit with some pretty important news about textile waste recycling in the last weeks. 👉 First, textile-to-textile (T2T) recycler Infinited Fiber Company in Finland announced that it is laying off staff to “adjust the company’s cost structure and operations” due to the failure to find more financing. 👉 Second, the Swedish recycler Renewcell went bankrupt, knocking another leading T2T recycler off the map. Both companies were operating far under production capacity. These events should be a shock to the fashion industry as the two firms were seen as leaders in textile recycling technology and saviors of the fashion industry. H&M was an investor in both companies and Inditex (ZARA SA) pledged to buy €100M in material from them. The mantra of the fast fashion industry has always been that “closed loop” T2T recycling will solve the textile waste problem. What went wrong? Various articles point out a variety of reasons for the failures, from the high cost of such recycled material vs. low cost of virgin textiles to the mismatch of the recycled pulp to clothing production machines in Asia, to lack of support from governments. (it's misleading as EIB and other gov. inst. extensively supported these companies). It is important to mention that both H&M and Inditex also had pre-signed contracts with both companies to buy their recycled textile materials and apparently backed out of the deals. So something clearly has gone wrong here. Even if the companies had succeeded, the impact on the 12 million tons of textile waste per year in Europe would have been less than 1%. 👉 First, Renewcell plant capacity was planned at 60,000 tons/year and Infinited Fiber Company 30,000 tons/year. 👉 Second, they only recycle cellulose-based waste, not synthetic materials, which is about 70% of all textile waste. ⚠ The answer is that clothing retailers and governments must stop their wishful thinking and realize that T2T recycling is not the answer to the problem. That is due to the complexity of the industry and the clothing itself, where complete T2T recycling is not that easy. However, it is too little, too late, and something else must be done. ❗ That is why it's time for clothing retailers and governments to think out of the box about what else can be done with 92 million tons of textile waste yearly! ♻ This is where companies like Greenful Group step in with a scalable business model that uses textile waste in very high volumes to manufacture sustainable construction materials that are 100% eco-friendly and low CO2. 👍 So there is still hope on the horizon if clothing retailers and governments get out of their narrow mindset for a complete “closed loop” solution and start thinking about other possible solutions. Otherwise, we will all be buried under the mountains of textile waste. #textile2textile #textilerecycling #textilewaste

Textile waste recycling: what does the fate of Renewcell and Infinited Fiber Company tell us? The fashion industry just got hit with some pretty important news about textile waste recycling in the last weeks. 👉 First, textile-to-textile (T2T) recycler Infinited Fiber Company in Finland announced that it is laying off staff to “adjust the company’s cost structure and operations” due to the failure to find more financing. 👉 Second, the Swedish recycler Renewcell went bankrupt, knocking another leading T2T recycler off the map. Both companies were operating far under production capacity. These events should be a shock to the fashion industry as the two firms were seen as leaders in textile recycling technology and saviors of the fashion industry. H&M was an investor in both companies and Inditex (ZARA SA) pledged to buy €100M in material from them. The mantra of the fast fashion industry has always been that “closed loop” T2T recycling will solve the textile waste problem. What went wrong? Various articles point out a variety of reasons for the failures, from the high cost of such recycled material vs. low cost of virgin textiles to the mismatch of the recycled pulp to clothing production machines in Asia, to lack of support from governments. (it's misleading as EIB and other gov. inst. extensively supported these companies). It is important to mention that both H&M and Inditex also had pre-signed contracts with both companies to buy their recycled textile materials and apparently backed out of the deals. So something clearly has gone wrong here. Even if the companies had succeeded, the impact on the 12 million tons of textile waste per year in Europe would have been less than 1%. 👉 First, Renewcell plant capacity was planned at 60,000 tons/year and Infinited Fiber Company 30,000 tons/year. 👉 Second, they only recycle cellulose-based waste, not synthetic materials, which is about 70% of all textile waste. ⚠ The answer is that clothing retailers and governments must stop their wishful thinking and realize that T2T recycling is not the answer to the problem. That is due to the complexity of the industry and the clothing itself, where complete T2T recycling is not that easy. However, it is too little, too late, and something else must be done. ❗ That is why it's time for clothing retailers and governments to think out of the box about what else can be done with 92 million tons of textile waste yearly! ♻ This is where companies like Greenful Group step in with a scalable business model that uses textile waste in very high volumes to manufacture sustainable construction materials that are 100% eco-friendly and low CO2. 👍 So there is still hope on the horizon if clothing retailers and governments get out of their narrow mindset for a complete “closed loop” solution and start thinking about other possible solutions. Otherwise, we will all be buried under the mountains of textile waste. #textile2textile #textilerecycling #textilewaste

Textile waste recycling: what does the fate of Renewcell and Infinited Fiber Company tell us? The fashion industry just got hit with some pretty important news about textile waste recycling in the last weeks. 👉 First, textile-to-textile (T2T) recycler Infinited Fiber Company in Finland announced that it is laying off staff to “adjust the company’s cost structure and operations” due to the failure to find more financing. 👉 Second, the Swedish recycler Renewcell went bankrupt, knocking another leading T2T recycler off the map. Both companies were operating far under production capacity. These events should be a shock to the fashion industry as the two firms were seen as leaders in textile recycling technology and saviors of the fashion industry. H&M was an investor in both companies and Inditex (ZARA SA) pledged to buy €100M in material from them. The mantra of the fast fashion industry has always been that “closed loop” T2T recycling will solve the textile waste problem. What went wrong? Various articles point out a variety of reasons for the failures, from the high cost of such recycled material vs. low cost of virgin textiles to the mismatch of the recycled pulp to clothing production machines in Asia, to lack of support from governments. (it's misleading as EIB and other gov. inst. extensively supported these companies). It is important to mention that both H&M and Inditex also had pre-signed contracts with both companies to buy their recycled textile materials and apparently backed out of the deals. So something clearly has gone wrong here. Even if the companies had succeeded, the impact on the 12 million tons of textile waste per year in Europe would have been less than 1%. 👉 First, Renewcell plant capacity was planned at 60,000 tons/year and Infinited Fiber Company 30,000 tons/year. 👉 Second, they only recycle cellulose-based waste, not synthetic materials, which is about 70% of all textile waste. ⚠ The answer is that clothing retailers and governments must stop their wishful thinking and realize that T2T recycling is not the answer to the problem. That is due to the complexity of the industry and the clothing itself, where complete T2T recycling is not that easy. However, it is too little, too late, and something else must be done. ❗ That is why it's time for clothing retailers and governments to think out of the box about what else can be done with 92 million tons of textile waste yearly! ♻ This is where companies like Greenful Group step in with a scalable business model that uses textile waste in very high volumes to manufacture sustainable construction materials that are 100% eco-friendly and low CO2. 👍 So there is still hope on the horizon if clothing retailers and governments get out of their narrow mindset for a complete “closed loop” solution and start thinking about other possible solutions. Otherwise, we will all be buried under the mountains of textile waste. #textile2textile #textilerecycling #textilewaste