Foundation Year 2 Doctor and RCPath Foundation Fellow interested in forensic pathology, death investigation and medical education
Our research on the attitudes of UK pathologists and judicial officers towards view and grants is available in JCP, demonstrating how social psychology can interface with forensic pathology to understand decision-making by death investigators: https://lnkd.in/eUvkfugJ. 1️⃣ This mixed-methods study measured what attitudes are held by pathologists and judicial officers towards view and grants, the reasons behind them, and their association with deciding the scope of postmortem examinations. 2️⃣ Positive and negative attitudes were found, and they predicted respondents' decisions to favour view and grant or invasive forensic autopsy in an ideal world but not in the real world. 3️⃣ Respondents were more likely to choose view and grant in all five ideal than real world scenarios, suggesting that what they wanted to do did not necessarily translate to what they would actually do. 4️⃣ Attitudes vary for several reasons, principally concerning the perceived ability of view and grants to determine a cause and manner of death, and whether this is compatible with the aims of the medicolegal system. 5️⃣ We propose that findings can be understood using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, and that this can be used to model decision-making in forensic pathology. Thank you also to the Association of Clinical Pathologists for recognising this project with their 2024 Incentive Prize for Junior Doctors. Centre for Forensic Medicine & Dentistry University of Dundee University of Bath The Association of Clinical Pathologists Sam Taylor #autopsy #attitudes #death #decisionmaking #forensicpathology
Looking forward to reading!
Stock & Systems Manager
5moSo proud of you Dr Foster, cannot wait to see what’s more to come 🎉