my favorite strategy document to date: "2024 Naval S&T Strategy" "We cannot manage our scientists and engineers to revolutionary results; instead, we must help them better understand naval problems, prove them with needed resources, give them early responsibility for projects, clear their obstacles, and let them work." (p 11) Tell me how to do this in the comments!
💡Naval Science and Technology Strategy 🎤 "As our Department continues to re-imagine and refocus our innovation efforts, I encourage all of you — our Nation’s scientists, engineers, researchers, inventors, entrepreneurs, and problem solvers — to join us. — We are indeed in an innovation race — and it is one we must win. ” SECNAV Del Toro ⛵ Sailing Directions for developing a maritime science and technology foundry to accelerate the delivery of technological innovation to the Navy and Marine Corps in an era of global competition. 🔦 SECNAV has established three enduring priorities to accomplish Navy and Marine Corps missions: 1. Strengthening Maritime Dominance 2. Building a Culture of Warfighting Excellence 3. Enhancing Strategic Partnerships. All the details 👇 https://lnkd.in/guZEf_VK
Principal Director, Human-Machine Interfaces OSD R&E
6moThis is important for all S&T, "aim small, miss small" is required to solve our hardest problems in the DoD. - Often, broad statements of need, without context from Requirements, PEOs or users are insufficient to bridge the gap and maximize S&T deliverables. - taking the time to unpack the specifics up front, pays dividends.