John Landsverk’s Post

View profile for John Landsverk, graphic

Healthcare Operations Leader | Senior Advocate | Value-Based Care | Bring Order Out of Chaos

In discussions with VBC companies and my network, this Patient Activation Measure (PAM) study keeps emerging related to effective Complex Care Management. It provides valuable insights into the baseline levels of patient self-management using the PAM-13 tool across four chronic diseases states. By grouping PAM Levels 1 and 2, a distinct hierarchy of low patient self-management skills becomes apparent across different diseases. With Chronic Kidney Disease and Congestive Heart Failure patients, a significant majority exhibit low PAM scores. This contrasts with COPD and DM2 patients where approximately half of patients show low PAM scores. I hope my fellow Pop Health enthusiasts find this instructive. A link to the study: https://lnkd.in/gSr9hVGD "Patient and disease characteristics associated with activation for self-management in patients with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure and chronic renal disease: a cross-sectional survey study"

  • No alternative text description for this image
Debbi Barnett

MBA, APRN, CPHQ | Health System Design Support | Champion for primary care and care transition connections

8mo

Because many, if not most CKD population members have progressive or long-standing DM2, it would be helpful to look at their PAMs over time and see if there is a trend towards when the PAM scores start decreasing as CKD becomes increasingly problematic. Is the difference a “progressive” decline from disease self-management fatigue OR do the results reflect two sub-populations, higher and and lower performing self-managers? Or a mix of both? The numbers would be worth further digging into…

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics