Joseph Noujaim’s Post

Another important draft law in America to tackle copyright infringement by AI companies. https://lnkd.in/eh-WvW3S "We strongly support the bill which prioritizes creators who continue to be exploited by unjust AI practices.” David Israelite President & CEO of 🇺🇸 group National Music Publishers' Association. There's no legal or moral excuse for AI or Big Tech companies accessing, training or generating #AI using digital music without permission. Doing so is simply ripping off artists & creators. Between the TRAIN Act & the COPIED Act, there is alignment with the infringement prevention & training transparency measures agreed in the EU AI Act - which gives clarity internationally. And as the many recent music industry deals by our member companies have demonstrated, legal #GenAI & #AI training is perfectly possible & there to be done. #ArtificialIntelligence #RealRights 🌎🎶

The AI Transparency Act: Who’s Training Who? Should AI developers be required to disclose the materials used to train their models? The music industry thinks so. Backing the proposed TRAIN Act, they’re pushing for transparency to protect creators’ rights and ensure fair use of their work. #AI #Copyright #Transparency #Legaltech

We have to hope that if negotiations occur - as they should - that pass through for artist royalties (mechanical and recording) yields more than 10^(-4) per “play” (tokenization, call, sample, etc. etc.). Something tells me artist/rights societies like SoundExchange , The Mechanical Licensing Collective , ASCAP (etc., etc.) are going to have to put feet on the dais in addition to/in concert with/in spite of whatever the majors do re: licensing for generative AI.

In case you missed it, Sony Music Entertainment has sent a declaration to 700 AI companies not to use their music catalog as training data, which they say would constitute copyright infringement. I assume the list includes Suno and Udio, which are incredible, but seem extremely likely to be trained on copyrighted music. Sony notes that they are open to negotiating licenses. And they set a deadline of later this month for responses. Licensing is gaining momentum, and content owners are finally starting to gain their footing. I think when we look back a few years from now, we will observe two key inflection points for this nascent market. The first is happening now, as AI companies gradually begin to license data that is cleaner than scraped data or that is difficult to obtain as "publicly available". The second will be once a legal case or two start to move in directions that threaten AI directly. Then there will be a rush to license rights before models risk needing to be shelved, and business terms will shift dramatically in favor of copyright owners. AI companies that are acting with foresight would be smart to engage in serious negotiations before that second inflection point strikes. #ai #ethicalai Calliope Networks https://lnkd.in/g_FmbvPv

This article from Complete Music Update highlights growing concerns within the music industry about the potential misuse of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The music industry fears AI being used to create derivative works or manipulate streaming platforms without proper attribution or compensation for original creators. The article argues that the recently implemented EU AI Act needs to be more effectively enforced to safeguard the rights of creators in the digital age. The music industry seeks clear regulations to prevent AI from undermining artistic ownership and devaluing original works. The article implies that the music industry is: While recognizing AI's potential, the industry fears its misuse could stifle creativity and financial reward for artists. The music industry needs robust legal frameworks to ensure AI is used ethically and responsibly. The article doesn't offer definitive solutions, but suggests a collaborative approach: Clearly defined regulations to protect intellectual property and ensure fairness in AI-driven music creation. Working with AI developers to ensure fair compensation for creators and maintain a healthy music ecosystem. #AI #MusicIndustry #EUAIact #Copyright #MusicProduction https://lnkd.in/dudQD_fH

🎧 Music Industry Lawsuits Highlight Need for First-Party Data Integrity in Publishing ⚖️ As lawsuits against AI music firms like Suno and Udio highlight, and 404 Media reports, the use of openly accessible datasets, including copyrighted content, is under increased scrutiny and regulation. The days of freely scraping the open web are numbered as rightsholders push for stronger protections. This shift underscores the importance of emerging data marketplaces and the critical need for publishers to build and maintain solid first-party data strategies. At Nota, we recognize the urgent need for responsible AI practices. Let's commit to doing AI the right way—by respecting intellectual property and fostering innovation that aligns with the evolving landscape of media rights. Read more: https://lnkd.in/ejXpdGt2

Pioneering Legal Challenge: AI in the Music Industry Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Records have initiated copyright lawsuits against AI companies Udio and Suno for using copyrighted music to train their AI models. Highlighted by Reuters as the first of its kind, these lawsuits signal the music industry's proactive stance against the challenges posed by music-generating AI, potentially reshaping the future development of generative AI in creative fields. As the industry navigates these technological advancements, it's crucial to consider the implications for both creators' rights and ethical AI use, ensuring a balanced approach for all involved. Ars Technica Benj Edwards Danny Goh Mark Esposito, PhD Terence Tse, PhD #MusicIndustry #CopyrightLaw #ArtificialIntelligence #TechNews #Transparency #EthicalAI https://lnkd.in/gF8G9f_A For more discussion, please visit https://lnkd.in/gqDPtry3.

Warner Music Group (WMG) and Sony Music have recently urged tech companies to refrain from using their music to train AI without permission. This development highlights the growing tension between the music industry and AI firms. Supporters of AI Training argue that using existing music to train AI models can lead to innovative advancements in music creation, providing new opportunities for artists and the industry as a whole. They believe that AI can be a tool for enhancing creativity and exploring uncharted musical territories. Opponents of Unauthorized Use stress the importance of protecting artists’ rights and maintaining the integrity of copyrighted material. They contend that using music without permission undermines the value of creative work and can result in legal and ethical complications. As we navigate this evolving landscape, it’s clear that a balance must be struck. Protecting artists’ rights is crucial, but so is fostering innovation in AI. How do you think we can achieve this balance? https://lnkd.in/eWc2fPCp

(Forbes) In order for generative AI systems to work, they need training data. And in the last week, more companies have taken a stand against AI companies using theirs without permission. ▪️ One of these fights will take place in the traditional place for copyright disputes: The court system. Three heavy-hitters in the music industry—UMG, Warner and Sony—sued AI music generating platforms Suno and Udio AI, accusing them of stealing their music. ▪️ The lawsuit says the AI music platforms use “massive and ongoing infringement” as they take copyrighted songs to train their LLMs. ▪️ In a statement shared with Forbes, Suno CEO Mikey Shulman said Suno “prize(s) originality” and tried to explain to the record labels that its technology is “designed to generate completely new outputs, not to memorize and regurgitate pre-existing content,” but Shulman said the labels “reverted to their old lawyer-led playbook.” #music #ai #aimodels #aimodeltraining #copyright #songs #llm #llmtraining #trainingdata #infringement #musicindustry https://lnkd.in/g53KexD6

It’s interesting to see content creators and publishers coming together to create a Bill of Rights about the use of AI for creative work in the music industry. The ability to create music with AI has been moving at a rapid pace, and we are about to reach an inflection point. Will artists in other fields follow suit with declarations of rights? Are book publishers and graphic artists next? I think so. https://lnkd.in/esh8h8bB