What are your thoughts on the debate? 👇 Comment below
Co-Founder at luna, the fastest growing health app for teens 🚀 | Follow me for insights on Business and Gen Z/Alpha | Oxford MBA
Smartphones can be dangerous, toxic and addictive. BUT a blanket ban for kids is not the answer. Seeing EE taking the potential of phone overuse seriously and making recommendations that aren't just motivated by profits is refreshing. But some of the debate is missing the positive things that smartphones can bring to young people. In my role as a Founder of a teen health app over the last 3 years, I understand what life as a teen is like today. Information is power; smartphones put that power in the fingertips of young people. That means the ability to: 👉 Supplement their classroom learning with dynamic online tools (e.g., revision platforms) 👉 Understand their finances (often not taught in schools) in a responsible way with apps (e.g., GoHenry) 👉 Access to confidential support (almost 3/4 of Childline's counselling sessions take place online) 👉 Learn from resources in relation to their health and wellbeing in a way that works for them (e.g., luna) I understand and agree with the reasoning for no phones in school. I completely believe that protecting youth online (especially primary school kids) is incredibly important. I worry deeply about the amount of misinformation on social media (the reason for starting luna) But I don't believe that a blanket ban is the way forward. Proportionate safeguards, staggered by age bracket are the way forward. We need parents, schools, tech companies, and government to be pulling in the same direction. I'd love to hear your thoughts below 👇 ******************* ♻️ Repost if you agree 👉 Follow Jas Schembri-Stothart for my views on Gen Zalpha