Mark R.’s Post

View profile for Mark R., graphic

Brand Planner at Meta

“I should be Employ’d in Greater things,” William Blake groaned in 1802 as he churned out hack work for a benefactor. Does this sound familiar? Who in advertising hasn’t worked on something that we all did simply because we needed to make ends meet not because we wanted to put the work in our book? Or how should we think about the disconnect between the realpolitik of lobbying and the idealism of marketing when talking about purpose? Does this defeat the notion of a purity test? It doesn’t mean you shouldn’t engage in what you feel is right (please by all means do it, make social impact) but maybe you shouldn’t impose purity tests or there is only one side to history on others who don’t share your beliefs. Or don’t have the luxury to afford them. We live in a complicated world, with a lot of compromises on the way through it. If you wanted purity overall would you have chosen advertising as a way to be pure? Here’s the article where the Blake quote comes from that gets into the long-standing fraught relationship between Art and Mammon. All views my own. All conclusions your own.

What a row over sponsorship reveals about art and Mammon

What a row over sponsorship reveals about art and Mammon

economist.com

Jason Chebib

Co-Chair, The Marketing Society New York

3mo

I never really 'checked out' emotionally unless I was working with a Client who didn't care. Up to that point, every opportunity in the comms world was an opportunity to do something extraordinary, no matter how small or niche the concern. Working with good people, we did lovely work on tiny Clients, tiny projects and tiny openings - and sometimes sadly bland work on big Clients with big budgets and big reach. There are reasons why some Clients are treading water or prefer to stay unnoticed - not good reasons, but reasons nonetheless - that was the only time we gave up and saved our energy for Clients who gave a damn. Of which there were plenty!

Joe Burns

Serving up strategic cold-cuts in a world of lukewarm hot-takes / Strategy @ Quality Meats Creative:

3mo

As a Blake obsessive I appreciate this post, to bastardize him a little bit there are things that are known and things that are unknown and between them there are doors. Those who can pass through those doors shouldn’t begrudge those who can’t, they should instead bring back gifts.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics