Ever noticed how everyone says 'hire slow, fire fast' but still gets it hiring wrong? Here is what most founders do: They talk to 2-3 candidates a week over a couple of months, focusing on two or three at a time. Then, they hire the first person who's a fit for the role. Here’s how we do it: 👇 We talk to all 15-20 candidates in a single week. Then, we move qualified candidates through the hiring stages in cohorts. ➡ That way, we usually end up with 2 or 3 people that are a fit and can pick the best one. Ok..we're compressing the hiring process, big deal. Why is that such a stark difference?! 🤔 Here's why: 1. Clear Comparisons: We see all our candidates side by side. This clear contrast helps us to push out the bad apples fast & easy. 🔓 But the biggest unlock: Often you talk to candidate # 13, and that person shows you what "good" REALLY looks like 2. Faster Process: Moving candidates together speeds things up. In a market where good people go fast, this is key. 3. Fairer Decisions: Interviewing one by one can skew your view. Seeing everyone at once keeps things level. So, next time you hire, it might be worth it to give that method a try 🤓
Streamlining the hiring process this way and making fair decisions benefits both the company and the candidates. Well done!
Java Staffing Solved | Top-Tier Spring Boot & AWS Devs | Accelerate Growth with Katyella.com
4moI like the cohort idea. Since your top choice maybe getting offers from others as well. It's good to have a backup plan