Overseas Shipholding Group’s Post

🌍💥 Environmental Impact of Warfare: The Carbon Footprint of Conflict Recent research has unveiled the significant yet often overlooked carbon emissions from military conflicts, with a study focusing on the Gaza conflict revealing emissions exceeding those of several climate-vulnerable countries. This analysis emphasizes the need to consider the environmental consequences of warfare in climate action. The research, highlighting both direct and long-term impacts, calls for greater accountability and an expanded approach to assessing global conflict repercussions, urging a reevaluation of how military operations are factored into global environmental strategies. #ClimateChange #WarfareImpact #EcoConscious #news #trending #sustainability #environment #war #israel #hamas #gaza #conflict #future https://lnkd.in/dFrGeM4t

Thought provoking perspectives from the Inuit as we consider how the DOD partners and consults with Alaskan Native communities while respecting their “mixed economy” and achieve operational imperatives as outlined in the National Strategy for the Arctic Region (NSAR). https://lnkd.in/gd7GTMKv #NationalStrategyfortheArctic #NSAR #ANWR #oilandgas #BLM #BOEM #departmentofdefense

National Security Memorandum on United States Policy in the Antarctic Region (NSM-23) This is the first time that such a Memorandum, concerning the Antarctic, has been publicly released. It replaces NSC-26 from 1994 which covered both polar regions. The Arctic was considered in a separate document in 2009, revised in 2022 and publicly released https://lnkd.in/g_fyRFQ3 But NSC-26 continued to be the acknowledged basis for Antarctic policy. Surprisingly it was not made publicly available shorn of the Arctic parts. One presumes that the material in NSC-26 that may have been sensitive in relation to the Antarctic is not reflected in the present Memorandum. It certainly appears a fairly anodyne document. Reiteration of known national positions, and commitment to existing ATS duties, which is positive, rather than anything obviously new. But helpful to have these - including positions re peaceful purposes, territorial claims, climate change, environmental protection, MPAs, prohibition of mineral resource activities, etc codified in an authoritative document.

The U.S. has gathered enough data over the past 20 years to map what it contends is its rightful territory in the extended continental shelf, the raised section of seafloor that goes past the 200-mile exclusive economic zone limit. The biggest and probably most important chunk is a section in the Arctic Ocean, north of Alaska, that is larger than California. There is some complex terrain on the seafloor, with ridges, canyons, plateaus and, potentially, lucrative natural resources. Climate change is reducing sea ice, allowing more ship traffic and activity there. One challenge to making this territorial claim: The U.S. has not ratified the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea, the treaty through which such claims are adjudicated. #Alaska #Arctic #LawOfTheSea #extendedcontinentalshelf #climatechange https://lnkd.in/gw38E6Ug

🌍 New Article Alert! 🌍 Excited to share a compelling read from Kelsey Frazier, Ph.D., EIT on the implications of climate change for US national security in the Arctic. This article delves into the multifaceted challenges and opportunities presented by the rapidly changing Arctic environment. Key highlights include: * The impact of diminishing sea ice and emerging weather phenomena on operational risks. * The strategic importance of leveraging technological advancements and international collaboration. * Economic potentials unlocked by new maritime routes and access to untapped natural resources. Dr. Frazier emphasizes the need for adaptive strategies, enhanced surveillance, and robust infrastructure resilience to navigate the Arctic’s evolving climate. This comprehensive analysis underscores the United States’ pivotal role in promoting security, stability, and prosperity in the region. 🔗https://lnkd.in/eHb67fRs Feel free to share your thoughts and insights on this critical topic! 🌐 #ClimateChange #NationalSecurity #Arctic #IndoPacific #Sustainability #InternationalRelations #Geopolitics #EnvironmentalSecurity #homelanddefense Air University Air University Press Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies Homeland Defense Institute (HDI) UAF College of Business and Security Management U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Pacific Air Forces Daniel K. Inouye Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies

Ever wondered who governs Antarctica? A quick overview of the Antarctic Treaty System: Antarctica is governed by the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), with the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 forming the basis of this system. The Antarctic Treaty was effectively established as a #peace and #scientific treaty and clarified regional #sovereignty in Antarctica. Initially, 12 countries were the first signatories - Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States, and USSR. There are now 57 states that have signed the Treaty, and 29 of those countries are Consultative Parties, which means they have voting rights in #Antarctic decision-making. All decisions in Antarctica are made by #consensus, so total agreement is demanded by all those 29 states. Generally, Consultative Parties meet yearly for the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM) to discuss current issues regarding Antarctic #governance. There are seven #claimants to Antarctica: Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Argentina, France, Chile, and the United Kingdom. Sovereignty in the Antarctic region was predominantly established by #discovery and subsequent #occupation, #activity, and #cession. Australia has a #territorial claim to approximately 42% of the Antarctic region. Building on the foundation of the initial peace Treaty, subsequent international agreements such as the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (#CCAMLR) and The Protocol on Environment Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (#MadridProtocol) have emerged. These agreements, which were primarily established to enhance #environmental and #conservation measures, mark significant milestones in the ongoing efforts to #protect the Antarctic region. CCAMLR was a significant advancement as an extension to regulate #fisheries, particularly the krill fishery, which had a significant dent in this region during the 1960s – 1970s. It established a Scientific Committee and Working Groups targeted at specific #marine living resources to develop a more comprehensive management system. Conservation and ‘best available #science’ are the values at the heart of CCAMLR. Finally, the Protocol on Environment Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Madrid Protocol) was adopted in 1991 and committed to protecting a region surpassing the Antarctic Treaty area. The Protocol established #environmental principles for planning and conducting activities, prohibited #mining indefinitely, implemented environmental assessment systems, established the Committee for Environmental Protection, and developed contingency plans to respond to environmental emergencies. The Madrid Protocol entered into force in 1998. 

The new Climate Resilience and Environmental Sustainability Science and Technology (CRESST) Strategy outlines the considerations in developing science and technology solutions for Arctic and northern-specific defence and security challenges posed by climate change.   Examples include researching infrastructure solutions that produce less greenhouse gas and are adapted to arctic conditions and making it easier for the Canadian Armed Forces to better support northern communities, including through the provision of search and rescue.   Read the full strategy: https://lnkd.in/eMz8J-Ej #ArcticScience #DefenceScience

new opportunities & risks for maritime shipping in far north, from debrief #sustainableplusstrategicshipping #arcticshippingchallenges #openarcticwaters #arcticgeopolitics https://lnkd.in/ec5w7aiK

Small actions can make a big difference when it comes to #ocean protection and #conservation ⋆｡𖦹 °🐋⋆｡˚♡ 🌊｡˚⋆🪸𓇼 Learn more about the #MissionOcean charter and how you can get involved! ➡️ https://lnkd.in/eu7Wzyue Mission Ocean #EUMissions #HorizonEU #OceanProtection #OceanCitizen #prep4blue

ARTICLE RECOMMENDATION 🌏 | For those engaged in the study or practice of climate diplomacy, particularly in relation to Pacific Island countries, we highly recommend a recent article in the Journal of Pacific History, titled 'Leading from the Frontline: A History of Pacific Climate Diplomacy.' Read more | https://lnkd.in/gz-RiiTN Co-authored by Wesley Morgan, a senior researcher at the Climate Council, George Carter (Salā Dr George Carter) from The Australian National University, and Fulori Manoa from the The University of the South Pacific, this article offers an in-depth analysis of the pivotal role Pacific Island countries have played in the global climate response. The piece outlines the history of regional climate politics within the Pacific Islands Forum, highlighting recurring tensions between Pacific Island states and Australia regarding climate ambition. This discussion is particularly relevant in light of Australia's current bid to co-host #COP31 with Pacific Nations. We welcome your thoughts and insights! #LeadOnClimate #ClimateActionNow #JustTransitionNow #BeAmbitious