Sometimes, it’s not the player with the best serve, the best forehand, the best backhand or the best movement who wins. How? I was talking recently with Caroline Garcia and Borja Duran on the Tennis Insider Club podcast about a key milestone in my career. I was coaching Marcos Baghdatis in a Challenger in November 2004, early on in his career. He went to the final, and was up against the world No 14, Dominik Hrbaty, playing at home. At the time, he was ranked around No 200 in the world. His opponent, a former French Open semi-finalist, was better than him in all aspects. Hrbaty also got off to a better start, gaining a double break early in the first set. I thought to myself: this is going to be tough. And yet, Marcos ended up winning. That day, I was a very bad coach because I didn't believe enough in my player. Marcos found a way; he wanted it more, and believed in himself, even when I didn’t. The only explanation was his competitive edge. He taught me a lesson I’ll never forget: that anything is possible on a tennis court. This was the same thing that caught my eye when I first saw Stefanos Tsitsipas play on YouTube as a 16-year-old. Sure, he hit the ball fantastic, but Stefanos’ standout feature was how competitive he was. He had that deep desire to win, and belief that it was possible. This asset is not called forehand, or serve, not even mental or physical: it's called competitiveness. It's the ability to find a way to win the point, win the game, the set, the match, even if you are not necessarily stronger than your opponent. Like all qualities, you can develop and work on it, but the ones who have it naturally have huge potential. As I shared with Caroline and Borja, Roger Federer recently shared a crazy stat in a commencement speech at Dartmouth University: even the greatest players in the world only win between 52 and 54 percent of points in their careers. The winner of a tennis match often comes down to one or two key points that shift momentum. Players that are fiercely competitive find a way to be the ones who win these points. #PatrickMouratoglou #tenniscompetitor #playeranalysis #tennis #sport
Such an important concept to follow by Roger Federer and acknowledged here by Patrick! Roger's speech at Dartmouth gives rise to the importance of effort in each task/point at hand but get's lost today more than ever when you just look at the win column! 54% to be the GOAT is very real in tennis and hopefully other sports can carry the same message!
good story - if there is a will, there's a way
We all have to find a way...
edc paris was a scam, biggest scam
Where there's a will there's a way!!
🙏 ❤️
Brilliant Analysis & Totally Correct
Chief Executive Officer | Athlete Management @ HPTA Middle East
1moImportant to note the difference between a Bagdatis…or Dimitrov…or Rune…players who will show flashes of brilliance vs the Federer, Nadal and Novak (and now Alcaraz, Sinner) who will have a level of consistency that never seems to diminish, but burns brighter with ever slam. Being just an U19 specialist coach, I would love to hear from the ATP Tour Pros on what that consistency is that skipped the generation of Tsitsipas, Zverev, Auger-Aliassime but is ever present in the likes of Carlitos and Sinner!