Climate Scientist | Distinguished Professor, Texas Tech | Chief Scientist, The Nature Conservancy | Author, SAVING US
What determines how much climate change we will see is not the physical science or even technology. We have what we need to reduce emissions. Our barriers are entirely political and economic -- and such obstacles can be overcome.
To effect systemic change, we must use our voices to advocate for that change: through voting, yes; but there is so much more. As individuals, we have the ability — and, we would add, the duty — to influence, shape and inform through advocacy, activism and informed dialogue.
As the French novelist Antoine de Saint-Exupéry wrote, “As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it.”
Read more of my essay with Michael Mann here:
https://lnkd.in/eWPUdQC3
"...the social science is clear: the most important thing an individual can do to tackle climate change has nothing to do with their personal carbon footprint.
To effect systemic change, we must use our voices to advocate for that change: through voting, yes; but there is so much more. As individuals, we have the ability — and, we would add, the duty — to influence, shape and inform through advocacy, activism and informed dialogue.
Research, and lived reality, show that individuals engaging with and advocating for change where they live, work, study, worship and play has driven massive societal shifts in the past and can do so again." - Michael Mann & Katherine Hayhoe
This advocacy is why I set up #ChoirsForClimate: visit the site at https://lnkd.in/ewB4m6mY . It provides a way to push for change through the arts. I want choirs to sing about climate change and advocate for system change - not just in concerts focused on it (though those have their place) but also as an item in their regular performances. The people we most need to reach about climate change won't often come to a concert that's about nothing else, but they may well come to a more varied concert, or one where climate change is related to the theme.
If your choir would like to make a difference to the world, you can do it by singing about the issues where you want to make change. The #ChoirsForClimate site has a huge variety of repertoire available for all levels from children's choirs to professionals, and much of it (including all the pieces I've written for the project) is free to download under Creative Commons licenses.
"A song that we all join to sing together will blaze our message like a fire" (lyric from "Why We Sing", available at https://lnkd.in/ddyymEn6 , for 2-part choir and piano)
Climate Scientist | Distinguished Professor, Texas Tech | Chief Scientist, The Nature Conservancy | Author, SAVING US
What determines how much climate change we will see is not the physical science or even technology. We have what we need to reduce emissions. Our barriers are entirely political and economic -- and such obstacles can be overcome.
To effect systemic change, we must use our voices to advocate for that change: through voting, yes; but there is so much more. As individuals, we have the ability — and, we would add, the duty — to influence, shape and inform through advocacy, activism and informed dialogue.
As the French novelist Antoine de Saint-Exupéry wrote, “As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it.”
Read more of my essay with Michael Mann here:
https://lnkd.in/eWPUdQC3
Seeking positions that will advocate for finding ways to create a just and environmentally balanced world, focusing on our shared nighttime space | Currently a Training Manager focused on emergency preparedness.
For us regular, non-expert, advocates and volunteers, the climate effort can be a hard place to exist in. #Hope, no matter how necessary, can be hard to lock onto and carry forth to our coworkers, friends, family, and small groups that we present to. But as Michael Mann and Katharine Hayhoe both remind us, to give into the doom that is an especially popular focus in the media, the ever growing mountain of dire headlines, is to give in and give up. I myself, while working on #lightpollution issues and striving to expand my efforts in protecting nighttime environments, can fall pray to sharing sensational headlines pointing out our eventual demise.
But the only way we fail is if we give into what the polluters of our world want: a self-defeating, spiraling circle of doubt and fear that eventually paralyzes us. If I decided that there was no hope, why bother reducing light levels and fighting to save species?
We can do this. We can always make things better, and prevent them from getting worse. It will just take a little work, and a little hope in the face of those who want us to give up. The future is what we make.
Climate Scientist | Distinguished Professor, Texas Tech | Chief Scientist, The Nature Conservancy | Author, SAVING US
What determines how much climate change we will see is not the physical science or even technology. We have what we need to reduce emissions. Our barriers are entirely political and economic -- and such obstacles can be overcome.
To effect systemic change, we must use our voices to advocate for that change: through voting, yes; but there is so much more. As individuals, we have the ability — and, we would add, the duty — to influence, shape and inform through advocacy, activism and informed dialogue.
As the French novelist Antoine de Saint-Exupéry wrote, “As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it.”
Read more of my essay with Michael Mann here:
https://lnkd.in/eWPUdQC3
What determines how much climate change we will see is not the physical science or even technology. We have what we need to reduce emissions. Our barriers are entirely political and economic -- and such obstacles can be overcome.
To effect systemic change, we must use our voices to advocate for that change: through voting, yes; but there is so much more. As individuals, we have the ability — and, we would add, the duty — to influence, shape and inform through advocacy, activism and informed dialogue.
As the French novelist Antoine de Saint-Exupéry wrote, “As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it.”
Read more of my essay with Michael Mann here:
https://lnkd.in/eWPUdQC3
“The Guardian survey asked scientists what actions they should take. While voting was top, stopping flying came second. For scientists in high-income countries like ours, flying is often the largest part of our carbon footprint. However, all the flying in the world is only three per cent of carbon emissions and the social science is clear: the most important thing an individual can do to tackle climate change has nothing to do with their personal carbon footprint.
To effect systemic change, we must use our voices to advocate for that change: through voting, yes; but there is so much more. As individuals, we have the ability — and, we would add, the duty — to influence, shape and inform through advocacy, activism and informed dialogue.
The results of positive climate action are beginning to be felt. It is likely that carbon emissions will peak this year and begin to drop in the following years thanks to a steady move to clean energy. Yet we do not wish to be Pollyannas either. Substantial additional policy progress is necessary to limit warming to below 1.5 degrees Celsius, and that means we need a lot more action from countries, cities and companies around the world.”
It is not an exaggeration to say that having a climate denier in the Oval Office will not only erode the climate progress we have made so far but also impact the future of this planet & generations to come in a way that cannot be undone.
It is also not an exaggeration to say that we have the power to stop this from happening: by exercising our right to vote. Voting is one of the most decisive ways we can safeguard the progress we’ve achieved & secure a sustainable future for the planet and generations to come. Let’s not waste this opportunity!
Your voice matters. Your vote matters.
#ClimateAction#climateactivism#yourvoicematters#YourVoteMatters#YourVoteIsYourVoice#Vote2024https://lnkd.in/gMKhXg75
Interdisciplinary Researcher | Exploring the intersections of Science, Society, & Environment | Focused on:
Climate Change and Sustainability
Climate Change Science Communication
Innovative Curriculum Design
I came across this interesting article by Bence Iványi, which provides a thought-provoking critique of contemporary climate discourse and highlights how certain communication practices can limit the effectiveness of climate action. By dissecting the use of the term "we," Iványi underscores the importance of acknowledging the diverse and often conflicting interests within the global response to climate change. The article also challenges the reluctance to confront capitalism's role in environmental degradation, suggesting that a more honest and politicized discourse is necessary to address the root causes of the crisis. Additionally, Iványi's exploration of how media representations can distance audiences from the reality of climate disasters calls for more engaging and impactful communication strategies. Overall, the article advocates for a more nuanced and honest approach to climate communication that can drive meaningful change by recognizing the complexities of global challenges and fostering a more informed and active public.
Check out the full article for an insightful read on the importance of effective climate communication!
#ClimateChange#ClimateChangeCommunication#Environment#Sustainibilityhttps://lnkd.in/ggm7aXvv
Excited to share my latest piece, “To Solve the Climate Crisis, Liberate the Discourse,” recently published on RealClearEnergy. As Western governments increase censorship around climate debate, it’s crucial to discuss the impact this has on our ability to find balanced and effective solutions. Check it out if you're interested in how open dialogue might pave the way for more sustainable, people-centered policies.
https://lnkd.in/eXBW_id4
Climate Tech Founder, Coach, Investor, Professor, Podcaster, Author, "Monk" — I post on startups, investment, personal optimization, and conscious leadership
This national expert in climate communications recently shared insights with the EFI (Entrepreneurs for Impact) CEO peer group community. Here are some highlights... 👇
Susan Joy Hassol is one of the top U.S. experts translating deeply scientific research on climate change into language that the mainstream public can understand. Below is her bio.
Here are some things she covered:
- We need urgency, action, and love to get more folks with agency to fix this.
- Climate change is an "everything issue."
- Survey of 60,000 people by Potential Energy Coalition show that protecting the planet for future generations is the biggest motivator by far.
- We have an "ambition gap" where even the Paris goals are not enough.
- $0 is the only wrong price on carbon.
- Carbon mitigated today is worth more than in the future.
- A survey of 130,000 people in 125 countries reveals widespread support for climate action. 69% willing to contribute 1% of their personal income, 86% endorse pro-climate social norms, 89% demand intensified political action.
Learn more in her Scientific American article - "The Right Words Are Crucial to Solving Climate Change" https://lnkd.in/eNM_bneM
Susan is the Director of Climate Communication and Senior Science Writer on the first three U.S. National Climate Assessments.
She's a Fellow with, a Board member of, or an award-winner from these groups:
- American Association for the Advancement of Science
- American Geophysical Union
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Her work has been covered in these publications:
- New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, Boston Globe, Time, Newsweek, The Guardian, The Independent, The Hill, and Scientific American
NEW DATA | If you’re worried about the state of nature today, you’re not alone: new research from Earth4All and Global Commons Alliance shows that 88% of people surveyed in the G20* are extremely, very or somewhat worried about it – while 87% feel the same about how we’ll leave the planet for future generations. More than half of people (52%) already feel exposed to climate and environmental risks.
People know there’s an urgent need to safeguard our planet for current and future generations – and that the time for bold, systemic action is now. Explore the Global Commons Survey results in full ⏩ https://ow.ly/N77550Tfyt8
*18 countries excluding Russia
We despair over the destruction of the Amazon rain forest to supply our taste for beef. This destroys biodiversity and releases sequestered carbon. Meanwhile, we destroy local biodiversity and diminish our land's capacity to sequester carbon merely to make Mother Earth look the way we want Her to look. Think twice about every hamburger, and mow less widely and less often. If you haven't yet, please read my open letter to the UAlbany community on accelerating the transition to modern, sustainable, tasteful groundskeeping: https://lnkd.in/eAn3MPBy
