Bird strikes are one of the greatest threats to aircraft in the initial phase of flight or during landing. These incidents can not only cause structural damage to the aircraft but also endanger the safety of passengers. The most recent incident occurred on October 20, 2024, when an Alaska Airlines flight from Portland to Orlando was interrupted due to a bird strike. Fortunately, no one was injured and the passengers were able to be transported to their destination on another aircraft. Bird strikes are a significant aviation safety risk, endangering not only the integrity of aircraft but also the safety of passengers. The Alaska Airlines incident highlights the need for airlines to be constantly prepared for such risks. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), such incidents are not only common in the United States, but also internationally. There have already been several incidents this year where aircraft have been affected by bird strikes. One notable incident occurred in January when a Lufthansa Airbus A340-300 was struck by a bird during a flight from Boston to Frankfurt, causing severe vibrations in the engine and prompting the pilots to turn around and land safely in Boston. The team at Space Intel is dedicated to mitigating the risks associated with bird strikes and space objects re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere. Stay safe and informed! #WeSawItComing ✈️ #AviationSafety #BirdStrikes #AviationChallenges #Satellites #SpaceDebris #SpaceIntel
Space Intel’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
🚨 Tragic Plane Crash in South Korea Sparks Aviation Safety Concerns 🚨 A devastating crash caused by a bird strike has left South Korea in shock and raised critical questions about airplane safety. This heartbreaking incident highlights the dangers of bird strikes and the urgent need for better prevention measures. Discover the full story, learn about the risks, and explore solutions to keep our skies safer. 🌐 Read the detailed article here: https://lnkd.in/gDxUck_F 📌 Key Topics Covered: What happened in the crash? Why bird strikes are dangerous. How can we prevent such tragedies? 🛫 Safer skies start with awareness. Let’s work together to avoid such incidents in the future. #AviationSafety #BirdStrikes #SouthKorea #TragicAccident #FlightSafety #TravelSafety #AviationNews #StayInformed #SafetyFirst 👉 Share this post to spread awareness!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
aviationgoals are a relatively common occurrence, particularly in the summer months. Thankfully though, the vast majority of strikes cause no damage, but the threat of a more serious bird strike is very real. As a result, it's vital that properly tested procedures are trained and implemented, so that serious incidents can be avoided. There are a number of bird strike prevention strategies in place, such as airports continually monitoring for birds and implementing bird scaring procedures to deter birds from congregating around the airfield. Pilot training also plays a big role. If a bird is on a collision course with an aircraft, by the time the crew see it, it's unlikely that avoiding action will be possible. So it's more often a case of accepting the fact that a bird strike is about to occur and then ensuring that any damage is minimised. We can achieve this by maintaining as low a thrust setting as possible, as it's been shown that bird ingestion into an engine at lower thrust settings will cause less damage than if it were at high thrust. The natural response from a crew that sees a flock of birds on final approach is to go around, but by initiating a go around, thrust is significantly increased and the extra noise can scare the birds. And when birds feel threatened, their natural response is to also go up - potentially into the path of the aircraft that's now going around. If a bird were to now go down an engine, the likelihood of the engine suffering damage has significantly increased due to the higher thrust setting. Therefore, as counter intuitive as it is, industry best practice is to continue the approach, with as low a thrust setting as possible when a crew sees birds on approach. Have you ever experienced a bird strike? 🎥 @aviationgoals #birdstrike #aircraft #flightsafety #pilottraining #airlinepilot #flighttraining #studentpilot #avgeek #airliners_daily #aviation #aviationlovers #landing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The airport in Muan reportedly warned the pilot about a potential bird strike. The question now is : Could a bird strike cause the catastrophic crash of a Boeing 737-800 during landing, resulting in the tragic loss of 179 out of 181 passengers? What are the latest advancements in science, engineering, and safety measures addressing bird strikes and aviation accidents? Let’s explore and share insights. #AviationSafety #BirdStrike #Boeing737 #AviationExperts #FlightSafety #AircraftEngineering #AerospaceInnovation #AviationAccidents #LinkedInAviation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The impacts of bird strike on aircraft safety, flight delays, cost of damage, public safety concerns are quite worrisome to the industry and there's need for more multi-stakeholder collaboration to mitigate these challenges.
A bird strike in aviation refers to a collision between a bird and an aircraft, which can occur during any phase of flight but is most common during takeoff, landing, and low-altitude operations. Bird strikes pose significant safety risks, including damage to aircraft structures, engines, and critical systems, potentially leading to emergencies. Key impacts include engine failure, windshield damage, and control surface impairment. Modern jet engines are designed to withstand bird ingestion to a certain degree, but large birds or multiple strikes can still pose serious threats. To mitigate risks, airports implement wildlife management programs, such as habitat modification, bird harassment techniques, and radar systems to monitor bird activity. Reporting and studying bird strikes also help improve design and operational procedures to enhance safety. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other regulatory bodies guide bird strike prevention and response.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Bird strikes, or wildlife strikes, have been a persistent challenge in aviation since the early days of flight. These incidents, which occur when birds collide with aircraft, often during takeoff or landing, can lead to catastrophic consequences. The December 2024 crash of a Jeju Air flight at Muan International Airport in South Korea, where a bird strike was identified as a contributing factor, has reignited global concern about this issue. According to the International Civil Aviation Organization ICAO, there were over 270,000 reported wildlife strikes between 2016 and 2021. While only 3% of these incidents caused damage, the potential for severe outcomes cannot be ignored. The Federal Aviation Administration FAA in the United States reports similar statistics, with over 90% of strikes causing no damage. However, the remaining incidents highlight the need for continued vigilance and improved safety measures. Bird strikes are not just a safety concern; they also have significant economic implications. The FAA estimates that wildlife strikes cause over $900 million in damage to U.S. civil and military aircraft annually. As air traffic continues to grow, particularly in regions with high bird populations, the risk of bird strikes is expected to increase. This article explores the causes, impacts, and potential solutions to this critical aviation challenge. Efforts to reduce bird strikes involve a combination of traditional and advanced measures. Airports like Muan use methods such as guns, air cannons, and loudspeakers to deter birds. However, experts emphasize the importance of proactive planning, including thorough environmental assessments before constructing new airports. Identifying and managing bird habitats near airports is crucial for minimizing risks. #AviationSafety #BirdStrikes #WildlifeManagement Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/ezsutSiX
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
✈️ Devastating Plane Crash in South Korea Raises Questions 💔🌍 On December 29, 2024, tragedy struck as Jeju Air Flight 7C2216, a Boeing 737-800, crashed during a belly-landing at Muan International Airport, claiming 179 lives out of 181 passengers and crew. This heartbreaking incident has raised a storm of critical questions: 🔍 What Happened? The plane belly-landed without visible landing gear and skidded down the runway before colliding with a wall, causing an explosion of flames and debris. Pilots had declared a Mayday following a bird strike warning but faced multiple challenges during the emergency landing. 🛬 Key Concerns Raised by Experts: 1️⃣ Landing Gear Malfunction: Bird strikes rarely cause undercarriage failure. Why didn’t the landing gear deploy? 2️⃣ Emergency Preparedness: Fire and rescue teams were reportedly unprepared. Why wasn’t the runway covered in foam? 3️⃣ Runway Setup: The aircraft touched down far down the runway and hit a navigation facility before slamming into a brick wall. Was the wall placement standard-compliant? 4️⃣ Pilot Decisions: Why was the landing attempted from the opposite direction after the bird strike warning? 📂 Investigation Details: Both the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) have been recovered, which will be pivotal in reconstructing the sequence of events. Under international aviation protocols, South Korea will lead the investigation with the assistance of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), as the Boeing 737-800 is an American-designed aircraft. 🌍 Broader Implications: The Boeing 737-800 has a solid safety record, but this crash underscores the importance of rigorous maintenance, training, and emergency response protocols. Bird strikes, though common, rarely lead to catastrophic outcomes, leaving many to question whether other technical or human factors played a role. 💬 Expert Insights: Geoffrey Thomas, editor of Airline News, said, “Bird strikes alone don’t usually result in such outcomes. The investigation will reveal whether multiple issues converged.” 🕊️ Remembering the Victims Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families affected by this tragic loss. May the lessons learned from this incident strengthen aviation safety worldwide. 💡 Let’s Keep the Conversation Going: What measures can we take to prevent such tragedies in the future? Share your thoughts below. #AviationSafety #PlaneCrash #JejuAir #SouthKorea #Boeing737800 #EmergencyPreparedness #LessonsLearned
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐞𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐤: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐑𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲. Airports with high bird strike rates require extra vigilance from aircraft maintenance personnel. While wildlife control is crucial, thorough post-strike inspections are essential for ensuring flight safety. A recent Airbus case study (https://lnkd.in/dManhaCZ) highlighted the dangers of skipping internal nose radome inspections after a bird or hail strike. The case study illustrates the risks of damage to radome internal composite structure even when outer surface may appear to be normal. Both Airbus and Boeing maintenance manuals emphasize the importance of post bird/hail strike inspections before releasing an aircraft to service. While turnaround times are crucial, prioritizing these inspections can prevent delays caused by undetected damage and ultimately guarantee 𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲. Let's prioritize safety by ensuring thorough nose radome inspections! Here's what you can do: 𝐃𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞-𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 𝐀𝐌𝐌 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 for detailed inspection protocols. 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 after any bird strike, regardless of external appearance. By working together, we can ensure the skies remain safe! #AviationSafety #Airbus #BirdStrikes
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Tragedy struck at Muan International Airport today, claiming the lives of 85 individuals aboard a Jeju Air flight. This devastating accident, caused by a potential bird strike, has ignited urgent conversations about aviation safety, particularly for low-cost carriers in South Korea. While the grief is palpable, this incident demands introspection. How can we enhance safety protocols in an industry that prioritizes cost? Are current wildlife deterrents sufficient near habitats like Muan's coastal wetlands? There must be a shift toward more rigorous safety measures and transparent communication from airlines to rebuild public trust. Let’s not just mourn but advocate for change. As we reflect on this loss, it's essential to demand accountability and improvements that prioritize passenger safety above all. The aviation industry cannot afford more tragedies; proactive steps must be taken to prevent a repeat of this heart-wrenching event. #AviationSafety #MuanAirport #JejuAir #SafetyFirst
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
On December 29, 2024, a tragic plane crash occurred at Muan International Airport in South Korea, resulting in the loss of 179 lives, with only two crew members surviving. Disturbing footage from the incident shows the aircraft veering off the runway, colliding with a barrier, and erupting into flames. As a Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE)practicnor , the analysis of this Jeju Air incident reveals a series of events with various contributing factors, underscoring the necessity for a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to aviation safety. 1. Bird Strike -Bird strikes represent a significant risk in aviation. Migratory birds, such as the Baikal teal, often travel in large flocks, increasing the likelihood of collisions. Airports generally implement bird control strategies, including noise deterrents, habitat management to reduce food sources, and visual deterrents. The control tower's alert regarding "bird activity" indicates an awareness of this risk; however, the measures in place were evidently inadequate in this instance. The airport may have underestimated the associated risks, Additionally, the existing bird control measures failed to prevent the strike, need a thorough review. 2. Pilot Response & Emergency Landing: The bird strike likely resulted in engine damage, adversely affecting the aircraft's performance and leading to an emergency situation. Was the pilot sufficiently trained to handle engine failure and with the subsequent landing gear malfunction? The pilot declared a mayday and attempted an emergency landing. However, the decision to perform a belly landing (without deploying the landing gear) raises concerns about potential inadequacies in training or procedures for this specific scenario. Stress and Human Factors: High-stress levels are common in emergency situations, and human error during such times is a recognized issue. The belly landing led to a runway overrun, with the concrete structure (localizer) at the runway Runway safety areas are established to prevent or lessen damage from overruns. Inadequate Runway Safety Area: The runway safety area was not sufficient to avert a collision with the concrete structure. Hazardous Placement of Structure. Data Recorder Failure: The absence of flight data and cockpit voice recordings before the crash significantly hinders the investigation.Recorders are engineered to endure crashes and deliver essential information. Recorder Malfunction: The simultaneous failure of both recorders points to a possible systemic problem. Were the recorders adequately maintained? This necessitates a comprehensive technical investigation. This incident highlights the necessity of a multi-layered safety approach. The breakdown of one control (bird control) triggered a series of failures. However, the team of experts is investigating, and they will determine the underlying causes so that it will not occur anywhere in the world."
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 Bird Strike Accident Highlights Urgent Need for Advanced Aviation Safety Solutions Recently, a United Airlines Airbus A319 departing from Newark to Dallas/Fort Worth experienced a dangerous bird strike shortly after takeoff, resulting in severe wing damage. Thankfully, the aircraft managed a safe landing, but this accident is a stark reminder of the risks bird strikes pose to both passengers and crew. With over 19,600 bird strikes reported in the US only, it’s clear that traditional wildlife control methods aren’t enough to protect critical airspace. This is where Skyline Guard comes in. At Skyline Guard, we’re pioneering a Robotic AI-powered, automated system designed to keep airspace clear and prevent bird strikes in real time. Our technology continuously monitors flight paths, actively deterring birds to ensure takeoffs and landings are safe—without harming wildlife. The goal? Saving lives, reducing costly repairs, and ensuring safer skies. To those invested in aviation safety, innovation, and operational resilience, let's work together to bring real solutions to this pressing issue. #aviationsafety #birdstrikeprevention #SkylineGuard #AI #innovation #airlinesafety #aviationindustry #FAA #airports #birdstrike https://lnkd.in/dGaD7NtE
To view or add a comment, sign in