Tom Conkle’s Post

View profile for Tom Conkle, graphic

CEO / Cybersecurity Engineer at Optic Cyber Solutions

With the recent release of the #NIST #CybersecurityFramework 2.0, my team has seen many organizations working to process the updates and determine “what next?” This can be a tricky issue – especially in research environments where an open flow of data is required to support the task at hand. Specifically, when working with universities, I find that many security and IT teams focus solely on the security aspects of protecting the data vs what access researchers need to be successful. Research organizations such as universities thrive by promoting open and transparent research to attract brilliant minds – however, we know that they must also safeguard sensitive information. Balancing this issue can be complex and this is where we see many organizations create issues for themselves. I wanted to highlight a Success Story from the University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division led by Plamen Martinov for balancing this issue. NIST works with organizations who have demonstrated success with using the #CSF to capture what worked and the value it brought to their team. If you’re looking at how to balance cyber requirements across teams and make sure that everyone is working in the same direction, be sure to check it out at the link below: https://lnkd.in/eArkr7Wa

Mat (Matthew) Heyman

CEO, Impresa Management Solutions

6mo

Still relevant…

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics