Former Member, NCLAT. Managing Partner VPS LAW ASSOCIATES/Advocate and Sr. Consultant/Arbitrator/Trained Mediator/Registered Independent Director
The recent post by Sakshi Agrawal, suggesting that “Judges do not pass orders without taking bribes,” is not only a reckless generalization but also an irresponsible statement that undermines the integrity of the judiciary. While freedom of speech is a fundamental right, it must be exercised with caution, respect, and a sense of responsibility, particularly when making allegations against an institution as vital as the judiciary. Such sweeping remarks tarnish the reputation of all judicial officers, the majority of whom work diligently and ethically to uphold justice. If there are specific instances of misconduct, they should be reported through appropriate legal channels with substantial evidence. Casting aspersions on the judiciary without proof not only erodes public confidence but also risks inviting legal action, as seen in the contempt charges imposed in this instance. Sakshi Agrawal is urged to exercise greater discretion in her posts and avoid making unverified or generalized statements about judges. Any grievances should be addressed through formal complaints rather than public allegations that lack specificity or evidence. Respect for the rule of law is a cornerstone of democracy, and carelessness in public discourse does more harm than good.
Freelancer || 12.2k LinkedIn audience || 3k WhatsApp community members || Hustling Learning || Law trek || Video creator
“Judges are not passing order without taking money.” I won’t fear saying it. Recently a case came before court room no. 45 where an advocate has spread a message on WhatsApp community :- “Ghoos liye bina judge log order nhi pass krte” Contempt of court charges have been imposed on him. P.S. - Lastly, collar ki button band karke hi court aaiye :) Connect with Sakshi Agrawal to know more court stuff.
Anmol Harna
2mo
Another student who thinks they know everything because they attended a few court hearings with their senior. The new gen of lawyers won't shy away from making scandalous statements just to get publicity.
Advocate | Banking & Finance Law | SARFAESI | FinTech | Legal Strategist | Crypto Trader
1moAn insightful and measured perspective. While freedom of expression is an essential pillar of democracy, it must be wielded with a sense of responsibility, especially when it pertains to institutions that underpin the rule of law, like the judiciary. Generalized statements, particularly without substantiated evidence, can inadvertently erode public trust and undermine the painstaking efforts of ethical judicial officers. Constructive discourse, through formal channels and backed by credible evidence, is always the most effective way to address grievances. This post elegantly underscores the need for nuanced, thoughtful dialogue in matters of such gravity.