Ven Johnson Law’s Post

Why Did the Judge Really Change Venue in the Bryan Kohberger Case? 🏛️ My Court TV Analysis 📺 Yesterday on Court TV, I discussed the recent decision by Judge Judge (yes, that’s his name!) to move the Bryan Kohberger case away from the county where the four college students were tragically murdered. The judge had discretion to keep it in the county or move it, and while either decision could have been legally sound, he chose to err on the side of caution. His reasoning? The overwhelming pre-trial publicity, community outrage, and security concerns. However, I can't help but wonder if there's more to it. Did the defense’s public survey sway the decision? Or was it simply to avoid potential appellate issues later? Ultimately, this high-pressure case is now someone else’s to handle. What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments! #LawLife #CriminalDefense #FormerProsecutor #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurder #VenueChange #LegalStrategy #CourtroomInsights

We are honored to share "Unthinkable" by Kyle Bachus, a beacon of hope and guidance for those enduring the toughest times. With over two decades of legal expertise and deeply personal experiences, including the loss of his mother, Kyle has crafted a comprehensive guide to navigating the complexities of catastrophic events. This book equips you with the knowledge to understand police investigations, assert your rights, and seek rightful compensation. Are you ready to find clarity and peace amidst chaos? https://lnkd.in/g5gAMMEC #WrongfulDeath #WrongfulDeathLawyer #RealAnswers #PersonalInjuryLaw

The Realities of Courtroom Credibility: Judges and the Human Condition. Gain insight on how judges weigh honesty over perceived perfection in restraining order hearings. This video explores the importance of acknowledging one's imperfections and presenting a believable narrative in court, rather than an implausible portrayal of sainthood. Judges, experienced in discerning truth, are more likely to believe someone who admits to human flaws than someone who claims flawless behavior. This advice is crucial for those preparing for a domestic violence restraining order hearing. Get a sneak peek of our 'Defeat the DVRO' course, offering strategies not found on YouTube, and learn how to present a credible case to the court. #RealisticDefense #CourtroomInsights #DefeatDVRO

Trial date certainty and court efficiency is the goal for civil plaintiff lawyers, defense lawyers, all of their clients, and judges as well. Especially when cases involve complex catastrophic claims and many out of state expert witnesses for both sides: These experts schedules are set many months in advance and thousands of dollars are paid to reserve their time. It is imperative that trials efficiently continue to move forward under the 7th Amendment. Lawyers on both sides have expressed concern that alteration in the use and/or application of the former Cuyahoga visiting judge process may adversely affect their trial date. While there has been expressed concern and fear of the unknown, the biggest question which currently remains to be answered is what measureable adverse effect will this have on civil trials after the massive delays created by covid. Cleary, based upon the information in the article, spins to visiting judges are down, and as such, there must be a positive cost saving benefit tied to this which is good. The question then becomes what trials were set that needed to be continued and reset after proper procedures have been followed by the assigned judge. And, what did each delay cost the litigants. Time will tell.

Join the Illinois Network for Pretrial Justice on April 18th at 6pm for the virtual launch event of our new report: Investing in Pretrial Justice in Illinois: A Vision for Supporting Communities After the End of Money Bond. While the end of money bond is what caught headlines, the Pretrial Fairness Act went far beyond ending wealth-based jailing—it transformed the state’s pretrial legal system. These changes have led to questions about whether certain court actors, law enforcement agencies, and service providers need additional funding to adapt to the new system. “Investing Pretrial Justice In Illinois” responds to these urgent questions and puts forward a framework to holistically address them. This event will take place online and feature an overview of the new report along with two short panel discussions with public defenders and service providers about the resources our communities need to thrive! Featured Speakers: Briana Payton (Chicago Appleseed), Colette Payne (Women’s Justice Institute), Lauren Wright (Illinois Partners in Human Services), Stephanie Kollmann (Children Family Justice Center), and more.

📢 Important Announcement! 📢 We are always interested in any legal changes and some exciting news has just landed. Starting this week at the Central Family Court, judges will be resuming wearing robes during proceedings as a pilot project to enhance formality and safety. This decision comes after concerns about incidents of violent behavior experienced by judges and court users. During the three-month pilot, a survey will be conducted to assess the impact of robing on family court proceedings, focusing on behavioural incidents experienced by judges and perceptions of authority and safety. Your safety and well-being matter, and this pilot aims to create a safer environment for everyone involved in family court proceedings. Do you think bringing back robes will make a difference to safety? #familycourt #robesareback

Judge David E. Muñoz, a former deputy public defender, brings his empathetic approach to family court in Fresno County. Drawing from his own experience as a defendant, he emphasizes the importance of communication and compassion in the courtroom. Muñoz's innovative approach in handling misdemeanor cases, characterized by mutual respect and empathy, has left a lasting impact on both defendants and attorneys alike. Read his profile to learn more about Judge Muñoz and his transformative influence on the judicial system. Subscribers only: https://lnkd.in/gzyPMXpM #FresnoCounty #LegalReform #LegalNews

📢 Important Announcement! 📢 We are always interested in any legal changes and some exciting news has just landed. Starting this week at the Central Family Court, judges will be resuming wearing robes during proceedings as a pilot project to enhance formality and safety. This decision comes after concerns about incidents of violent behavior experienced by judges and court users. During the three-month pilot, a survey will be conducted to assess the impact of robing on family court proceedings, focusing on behavioural incidents experienced by judges and perceptions of authority and safety. Your safety and well-being matter, and this pilot aims to create a safer environment for everyone involved in family court proceedings. Do you think bringing back robes will make a difference to safety? #familycourt #robesareback

Talk about an attorney making an impact. Thanks again, Matt!

7 courtroom lessons from a 18-year attorney to improve your health and wealth in 2024: ♻️ Repost this to help others out!