World Conf Research Integrity reposted this
professor emeritus of methodology and integrity @ Vrije Universiteit and Amsterdam Universities Medical Center
Recommended Practice for the Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern: https://bit.ly/3xMJehG Very important Recommended Practice, as there is a lot room for improvement in the labeling of retracted publications as such: https://bit.ly/3XLhu7P
professor emeritus of methodology and integrity @ Vrije Universiteit and Amsterdam Universities Medical Center
“The people who work in research integrity come up with a range of different terms for this, they call it HARKing, p-hacking, selection bias, and so on,” he says. “But I believe the simplest answer is staring us in the face. We are asking people to do things [statistical analysis] they are not trained for.”
Lex Bouter explains why empowering researchers to conduct research responsibly is more important than diagnosing research misconduct and sanctioning offenders; at the latest editorial of BMJ: https://lnkd.in/dVZG3s55
📽️🎉 Relive the Best Moments of #WCRI2024! 🎉📽️ We're thrilled to share the highlights from this year's WCRI Conference 🌟 From inspiring keynotes to engaging panel discussions, and all the networking in between, this video captures the essence of what made the event truly special. A huge thank you to everyone who participated and contributed to the success of the congress: 🙌 Our amazing delegates for their enthusiasm and insights 💼 Our generous sponsors for their invaluable support 👥 Our dedicated organizing committee for their hard work and teamwork Your contributions made this event unforgettable! #WCRI2024 #Highlights #ThankYou Lex Bouter Maura Hiney Panagiotis Kavouras Eleni Spyrakou Costas Charitidis
"At WCRI, it was clear that Open Science must be practiced with a strong ethical framework to prevent issues such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and misrepresentation. Moreover, sharing raw data and detailed methodologies allows other researchers to reproduce and verify results. This reproducibility is crucial for building a solid foundation of scientific knowledge. By making research processes transparent, Open Science increases accountability among researchers. The synergy between Open Science and research integrity was a central theme at WCRI. Moving forward, fostering an environment where these principles are expected is essential. Key steps include policy development, training and education and community engagement." - an insightful blog by OpenAIRE AMKE on #WCRI2024. https://lnkd.in/dsx45SAb
"Start working reproducibly from the start of your project; the sooner you learn how to do it, the easier it is and the more you will gain from it," says Dr Michael De Boer of the Netherlands Reproducibility Network (NLRN) as part of his advice to early career researchers. In this interview on strengthening scientific integrity De Boer gives advice on how one can make your research more reproducible, and what infrastructure and support is in place to help researchers do this: https://lnkd.in/eU6uf-bJ
How do we ensure trustworthy science? This insightful blog post by Panagiotis Kavouras discusses this issue with respect to #OpenScience via LSE Impact Blog https://lnkd.in/e2aTxRRf
professor emeritus of methodology and integrity @ Vrije Universiteit and Amsterdam Universities Medical Center
Interesting Resesarch Integrity conference in Rio de Janeiro. Call for papers and registration at https://lnkd.in/dUEWtCpb
The #WCRI2024 saw many fascinating presentations. One of the popular events was the presentation on 'tortured acronyms' and how these can be used to identify possible misconduct. If you missed the presentation - here is a great piece by Cathleen O'Grady for Science Magazine https://lnkd.in/d3UBn2iv
