Wee-Kean Fong’s Post

View profile for Wee-Kean Fong, graphic

GHG | Climate | Sustainability

Last week the GHG Protocol Secretariat released final summary of Scope 2 survey feedback. The survey feedback will inform the upcoming update to the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance that was published in 2015. Below are some highlights of the findings. The detailed report is accessible from the link below and here: Scope 2 Survey Summary_Final_0.pdf). I would encourage companies to follow this updating process as it will likely have quite significant impacts on corporate RE strategy. 1. The GHG Protocol should consolidate its requirements across all these documents, i.e., scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 into a single document to streamline accounting and reporting. 2. The GHG Protocol should coordinate closely with other GHG programs and requirements, including the SBTi, EU CSRD, US SEC, and ISSB. 3. There are significant feedbacks representing multiple perspectives on the dual reporting requirement. Support for the location-based approach emphasized that it appropriately represents emissions throughout the reporting entity's value chain; while support for the market-based approach emphasized that it is necessary to account for purchased energy attribute claims, which may differ from the actual energy flow in the grid. 4. The updates should consider accounting standards and clean energy procurement opportunities that are feasible to implement for organizations of all sizes, sophistication levels, and global regions. 5. There is calling for new emission impact-based reporting approach for demonstrating the emission reduction effects of buying clean energy. This approach involves accounting for the emission reductions resulting from replacing carbon-intensive power plants with cleaner energy sources.

GHG Protocol Releases Final Summary of Scope 2 Survey Feedback

GHG Protocol Releases Final Summary of Scope 2 Survey Feedback

ghgprotocol.org

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics