Why ESG is not synonymous with Sustainability

Why ESG is not synonymous with Sustainability

In recent years, discussions around responsible business practices have gained considerable momentum. Two terms that often find themselves at the center of these conversations are ‘ESG’ and ‘sustainability’. While they might appear interchangeable, it's crucial to recognize that they are not one and the same.

ESG: A lens for investors

ESG factors have emerged as a critical framework for evaluating a company's performance in three key dimensions: environmental, social, and governance. Investors have embraced ESG criteria as a means to assess the non-financial risks and opportunities associated with an investment. While ESG does address some sustainability concerns, it primarily serves the interests of investors seeking to manage risk and maximize financial returns.

Companies evaluated through an ESG lens are expected to demonstrate responsible practices in areas such as carbon emissions, workplace diversity, and board governance. This focus on transparency and accountability is crucial for investors looking to align their portfolios with specific values. However, ESG's primary aim is to enhance financial performance and reduce potential risks, often overshadowing broader, long-term sustainability objectives.

Sustainability: A holistic and long-term vision

Sustainability is a more comprehensive concept that extends beyond the financial realm. It encapsulates not only environmental stewardship, but also social equity and economic viability. Unlike ESG, which can be predominantly investor-centric, sustainability considers the well-being of multiple stakeholders, including communities, future generations, and the planet.

A sustainable business approach aims to balance profitability with ethical responsibilities. This entails fostering enduring relationships with employees, customers, suppliers, and local communities. Sustainability encourages businesses to operate within planetary boundaries, innovate for circular economies, and invest in social initiatives that extend beyond what might yield immediate financial gains.

The need for a holistic approach

While ESG criteria play a crucial role in encouraging companies to address specific issues, they must not be mistaken for a comprehensive sustainability strategy. Focusing solely on ESG factors can inadvertently lead to 'greenwashing' – a practice where companies tout their environmental efforts without substantiating their claims. This narrow focus can also limit businesses from exploring wider avenues of innovation and transformative change that are essential for a sustainable future.

Incorporating ESG practices within a broader sustainability framework is the key to aligning business practices with the needs of our planet and society. By adopting a holistic approach, companies can work towards minimizing negative impacts, maximizing positive contributions, and ensuring that their operations are in harmony with both immediate and long-term goals.

In conclusion

ESG and sustainability are intertwined concepts, but they cater to distinct perspectives and objectives. ESG provides a lens for investors to evaluate a company's performance through the dimensions of environmental, social, and governance factors. Sustainability, on the other hand, represents a holistic vision that encompasses the well-being of all stakeholders and the planet. Recognizing the differences between the two is crucial for businesses, investors, and policymakers alike to drive meaningful change and create a more equitable and resilient future. As we navigate the complex challenges of our time, embracing both ESG principles and a broader sustainability mindset will be essential for shaping a world that thrives on multiple fronts.

Abrar Ahmed

Trade Finance specialist

1y

Quite right to draw the distinction between ESG goals and “sustainability”. The sustainability aspect is narrowly encompassed not only within the “E” component of ESG but also the within the 17 goals of the UN SDG. The measure of sustainability remains comparative between the lesser developed and the more developed nations and quite often, the lesser developed countries contribute far less to carbon emissions and the like, a key factor under environmental considerations. Unusually, it seems that the ESG credentials rather than balance sheet strength are now playing a more prominent part under financial/credit risk considerations not only for investors but also for credit rating agencies’ grading. What may be required from ESG consideration is more focus on and alignment with the other aspects (education, industry innovation, poverty reduction etc) of SDGs.

Like
Reply
George RR Wilson

Head Institutional Trade Finance @ Investec | Financial Risk Management

1y

There certainly is a difference between narrow ESG investment perspectives and much more holistic sustainability evaluations but the really key, most overlooked distinction is the complete obliteration of developing markets interpretations of sustainability in their markets by first world ESG ‘experts’ rehearsing developed market subjective ESG investment criteria to overcome greenwashing accusations for the bonds or debt they are peddling: there is much more to sustainability in the UN SDGs in the developing World than trite green transition in the West…

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Farah Mammadli 🍉

  • Greenwashing: A Guide for the Well-Intentioned

    Greenwashing: A Guide for the Well-Intentioned

    In a world where sustainability has become a buzzword, it's essential to distinguish between genuine efforts and mere…

    2 Comments

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics