Why are the Presidential Election contests in the swing States in the U.S. so close? | Data

Battleground States have middling urbanisation and college graduate numbers, and a diverse mix of racial and religiously non-affiliated voters

Updated - September 12, 2024 09:11 am IST

Picture used for representational purpose

Picture used for representational purpose

An earlier Data Point focussed on the importance of swing States in deciding the outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential polls. Here, we explain why these States are battlegrounds by looking at the background variables of voters, such as demography, religion, geographical type, and college education.

Urban voters largely favour the Democrats, while rural voters largely favour the Republicans (Chart 1A). Voters who identify themselves as religiously unaffiliated tend to prefer the Democrats, while Protestants and evangelical voters prefer the Republicans (Chart 1B). Voters of the Black/African American community distinctively favour the Democrats. College-educated white voters are largely Democratic voters, while non-college educated white voters are overwhelmingly Republican (Chart 1C).

Chart 1 shows Democratic and Republican voters in the 2020 and 2022 elections (%).

Chart appears incomplete? Click to remove AMP mode

Also read: The ‘swing State’ skew in the U.S. electoral framework

When these variables are broken down State-wise, we find that States with higher urban populations (with exceptions) tend to favour the Democrats, while those with higher rural populations vote Republican (Chart 2). Swing States have middling urbanisation (measured as an index by 538.com), i.e. they have a mix of rural, suburban, and urban voters. That is why they are competitive with near-equal numbers of Democratic and Republican voters. They also fall somewhere in the middle when we look at the share of the population who are college graduates (Chart 3).

Chart 2 plots the urbanisation index against the difference in vote shares (Dems.’ minus Reps.’) for States.

Chart 3 plots the share of graduates (or higher degree) in States against the difference in vote shares.

States such as Georgia have a relatively higher number of voters who identify themselves as Christian, but Georgia has a relatively higher share of Black voters, which makes it competitive (Chart 4). States such as Pennsylvania and Michigan have a lower share of racial minority voters, but also a relatively high share of religiously unaffiliated voters, and so they are competitive (Chart 5).

Chart 4 plots the percentage of people in States affiliated with Christian denominations against the difference in vote shares.

Chart 5 plots the share of the non-white population of States against the difference in vote shares.

Source: Pew Research, FiveThirtyEight

Also read: A shift in the U.S. to autocratic trends

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

  翻译: