Designing a hiring process in schools is surely all about identifying the best teachers, not the best letter writers.
But whenever we discuss leveraging insights from other sectors, we often hear, "but we're a people-centric sector." Yet, at application stage, we continue to rely on how people write contrived letters (not who they really are) to make determinations about whom we want to interview.
While some schools doggedly stick to their beliefs on this topic, the reality is that cover letters (and for that matter, CVs) have been empirically proven in decades of academic research, to have zero predictive validity in hiring across pools of equally qualified candidates.
These artifacts only really tell us how good a person is at writing a DOCUMENT that resonates with that particular reader's biases, not how good they may actually be as a teacher.
Surely we can see the conflict here? In a talent shortage situation, covering letters are reinforcing inbuilt biases, rather than opening our mind to considering different people whom our processes have excluded in the past.
To demonstrate the futility of this requirement in schools doggedly sticking to this requirement, we created a cover letter generator. It encompasses the job advert, the values of the school (taken from their website), and the information gleaned from the CV. This tool is part of a series we're building—not for commercial gain or internal efficiency, but to drive conversations around the need for reform in talent management within the education sector.
Give it a try.....its far from perfect, but it should cause pause for thought about the things we're asking candidates to do, which become rendered meaningless with technology.
Join us in rethinking how we hire teachers. It's time to move beyond outdated practices and adopt methods that truly reflect a candidate's potential to excel in the classroom. #EducationReform #TalentManagement #EdTech #FutureOfWork