Our 'Why' at UK for Good is to build a 'cleaner, greener, fairer, future'. I hate to admit, that we've failed. Take a look at the quote from Marinel Ubaldo, RSW in the new Oxfam report to see how we've failed. So what can we learn and how can we do things differently? How can we step up? We need to be more courageous, compassionate, and committed to our 'why', our 'vision'. Will you help us? #CourageousLeadership
I have to tell you that I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed this morning. Overwhelmed, discombobulated, angry, frustrated, and extremely sad. (If you're pressed for time, just read the quote from Marinel Ubaldo, RSW at the end of my post.) All I can hear on the news is budget blah, blah, blah. And as vitally important as it is, the focus is so desperately skewed toward what the budget may mean from a financial perspective, right here, right now for individuals, and particularly wealthy individuals - those with the greatest choice. Those with wealth and choice seem extremely perturbed that their taxes may go up slightly, and are even considering moving abroad to avoid that . According to CNBC Inside Wealth: "Almost two-thirds (63%) of wealthy non-dom investors said they plan to leave the U. within two years or “shortly” if the Labour government moves ahead with plans to ax the colonial-era tax concession." So what's really bothering me? What's really, really bothering me this morning is reading this report from Oxfam which clearly illustrates the disproportionate negative impact of the wealthy on those with the least choice and wealth. It's just not fair. Oxfam’s report details three critical areas, providing national and regional breakdowns, where the emissions of the world’s richest 1 percent since 1990 are already having —and are projected to have— devastating consequences: 😡 Global inequality. The emissions of the richest 1 percent have caused global economic output to drop by $2.9 trillion since 1990. The biggest impact will be in countries least responsible for climate breakdown. Low- and lower-middle-income countries will lose about 2.5 percent of their cumulative GDP between 1990 and 2050. Southern Asia, South-East Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa will lose 3 percent, and 2.4 percent, respectively. High-income countries, on the other hand, will accrue economic gains. 😡 Hunger. The emissions of the richest 1 percent have caused crop losses that could have provided enough calories to feed 14.5 million people a year between 1990 and 2023. This will rise to 46 million people annually between 2023 and 2050, with Latin America and the Caribbean especially affected (9 million a year by 2050). 😡 Death. 78 percent of excess deaths due to heat through 2120 will occur in low- and lower-middle-income countries. BUT, it's this quote from Marinel Ubaldo, RSW that has really got to me: “It’s become so tiring, to be resilient. It's not something that I have chosen to be —it was necessary to survive. A child shouldn’t need to be strong. I just wanted to be safe, to play in the sand —but I was always fleeing when storms came. Counting dead bodies after a typhoon isn’t something any child should have to do. And whether we survive or not, the rich polluters don’t even care,” Why do we think this is ok? Why is this not front and centre of our minds? How might we work together to shape a cleaner, greener, fairer future. #ClimateJustice