How do you choose between being an in-house or consultant incident responder?
If you are interested in a career in incident response, you may wonder whether you should work as an in-house or consultant incident responder. Both options have their pros and cons, and the decision depends on your personal goals, preferences, and skills. In this article, we will compare and contrast the main aspects of being an in-house or consultant incident responder, such as the scope of work, the level of autonomy, the skills required, the salary and benefits, and the career development opportunities.
As an in-house incident responder, you work for a specific organization and focus on its security posture, policies, and procedures. You are responsible for detecting, analyzing, and responding to incidents that affect the organization's assets, data, and reputation. You may also be involved in developing and implementing incident response plans, conducting security audits and assessments, and providing training and awareness to other staff members. As a consultant incident responder, you work for a third-party firm that provides incident response services to multiple clients across different industries and sectors. You are hired to handle specific incidents that require external expertise, or to perform proactive tasks such as threat hunting, penetration testing, or security reviews. You may also be required to travel frequently to different locations and work under tight deadlines and pressure.
As an in-house incident responder, you have more control over your work schedule, environment, and tools. You can customize your workflow and processes to suit your organization's needs and culture. You can also build long-term relationships with your colleagues and stakeholders, and gain a deeper understanding of your organization's business and operations. As a consultant incident responder, you have less autonomy and more variability in your work. You have to adapt to different client expectations, requirements, and constraints. You may also have to use unfamiliar tools and platforms, or follow strict protocols and standards. You may have less say in the scope and direction of your projects, and more accountability for the outcomes and deliverables.
As an in-house or consultant incident responder, you need to have strong technical skills in areas such as network and system forensics, malware analysis, threat intelligence, and incident management. You also need to have soft skills such as communication, teamwork, problem-solving, and critical thinking. However, as an in-house incident responder, you may benefit from having more specialized skills in your organization's industry, domain, or technology. You may also need to have more business acumen and strategic vision to align your incident response efforts with your organization's goals and priorities. As a consultant incident responder, you may benefit from having more generalist skills that can apply to different scenarios and contexts. You may also need to have more flexibility and adaptability to cope with changing demands and situations. Additionally, you may need to have more sales and marketing skills to promote your services and attract new clients.
-
From my experience, choosing between in-house and consultant incident responder roles depends on your goals. As an in-house responder at a global company, I gained deep specialization but saw major incidents infrequently. However, working in a SOC, I encountered incidents that a global customer might see every two years on a weekly basis, gaining rapid, broad experience. Consultants face diverse challenges, while in-house roles offer stability and long-term growth. Consider if you prefer broad exposure or specialised knowledge.
As an in-house incident responder, you may enjoy a more stable and predictable income and benefits package. You may also have access to perks such as paid leave, health insurance, retirement plans, and education assistance. However, you may have less room for negotiation and advancement in your salary and benefits, depending on your organization's budget and policies. As a consultant incident responder, you may have a more variable and lucrative income and benefits package. You may also have more opportunities to increase your earnings by taking on more projects, clients, or roles. However, you may have less security and stability in your income and benefits, depending on the market demand and competition. You may also have to cover your own expenses such as travel, equipment, and insurance.
As an in-house incident responder, you may have more opportunities to grow and advance within your organization. You may also have more support and guidance from your managers and mentors, and more access to training and development resources. However, you may have less exposure and diversity in your work experience and portfolio, depending on your organization's size and scope. You may also face more competition and politics for promotion and recognition, depending on your organization's culture and structure. As a consultant incident responder, you may have more opportunities to expand and diversify your work experience and portfolio. You may also have more visibility and reputation in the industry and community, and more chances to network and collaborate with other professionals. However, you may have less structure and direction in your career path and goals, depending on your firm's vision and values. You may also face more challenges and risks in maintaining your skills and relevance, depending on the market trends and innovations.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
CybersecurityWhat are the most effective incident response reporting formats for different stakeholders?
-
CybersecurityWhat challenges do organizations face when implementing incident handling tools and techniques?
-
CybersecurityHow can you lead a cybersecurity incident response team?
-
Incident HandlingHow do you define and assign incident response team roles in your organization?