Uplevel

Uplevel

Software Development

Seattle, Washington 2,203 followers

Understand your 15,000-engineer organization as if it were five.

About us

Uplevel provides a system of decision that engineering leaders need to make the right decisions. Interpreting and correlating data from work management, code, CI/CD, calendar, chat, and incidence response tools, Uplevel helps you align investments to outcomes so you can deliver the right things in the right ways.

Industry
Software Development
Company size
11-50 employees
Headquarters
Seattle, Washington
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2018
Specialties
software, engineering intelligence platform, software developer analytics platform, engineering analytics platform, and engineering metrics platform

Locations

  • Primary

    500 Union Street

    Suite 325

    Seattle, Washington 98101, US

    Get directions

Employees at Uplevel

Updates

  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    View profile for Joe Levy, graphic

    CEO @ Uplevel | helping leaders drive effectiveness, efficiency, and alignment with engineering intelligence | personality of a Labrador

    “Your day is under siege by interruptions. It’s on you to fight back.” - Jason Fried I talk a lot about leadership and setting priorities. When a dev team is unfocused, and each contributor is juggling a dozen projects, it’s a sign that leadership hasn’t done their job. Specifically, the two factors that will increase developer productivity the most is: 1️⃣ Ability to focus on coding features, aka - deep work time. 2️⃣ Very clear prioritization of which features to work on and why. Working as a dev, writer, designer, or any other creative role today requires clear priorities and time for deep work. Deep work is the meta skill of proficient white collar workers. If code is the primary skill for your job, then I would argue that maintaining your focus time should be what you have to master. Today, everything vies for your attention. Slack messages. Social media. Email. News. Doing good work means putting away those distractions to do the work that counts. #deepwork #focus #developerproductivity

  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    The most important part of a build pipeline is generating fast feedback. You want to give engineers feedback on their code as soon as possible, before their context shifts to the next task. Here’s why: Developers can act quickly on changes while their mind is still on the project. You remember what you wrote and where you wrote it. You know why you added a particular line of code (and omitted another). Receiving feedback when the project is still a lingering memory is advantageous. The context is still in your “cache”. After enough time has passed, the “cache” for that task is cleared. You lose context. The memory fades and it takes longer to dive back into the work. It requires more time and energy to implement the same feedback. This isn’t a novel idea. Most devs know they should have fast checks in place. But knowing the best practices and implementing them are not the same. It’s very easy to have those times grow unchecked. Hmm… maybe I should go check our build times. 🤔 #engineeringmanagement #CTO

  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    View profile for Christina Forney, graphic

    VP Product at Uplevel | Developer → PM, focused on dev tools | Ex-Sourcegraph, Palantir | Talk to me about developer productivity

    Marty Cagan distinguishes between two types of teams: the mercenaries and the missionaries. The mercenary teams are the "ticket takers". They're just doing the next thing in front of them, checking off the boxes without much deeper investment. They're content to churn out features and fix bugs, but they lack that true sense of purpose and ownership. And then there are the missionary teams. These are the ones who are deeply invested in the customer experience, driven to solve real problems and make a meaningful impact. They're the ones who challenge assumptions, dig deeper into user needs, and are constantly seeking to understand the "why" behind the "what." Now, I'm not saying that mercenaries are bad or that missionaries are the only way to go. While I believe a missionary team will deliver better results - and is a joy to be part of - I’m coming around to the fact that there's a time and a place for both. The distinction is a helpful gutcheck. Because managing a mercenary team like a missionary team just makes everyone miserable, and you’ll spin your wheels, losing productivity entirely. You can’t just flip a switch. Meet your team where they are at and give them the support they need the way they need it. At the end of the day, it's not about checking boxes or hitting deadlines. It's about creating something that truly makes a difference in people's lives. That kind of work, the kind that comes from a place of deep passion and purpose, can take many different paths to get there.

  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    New engineers: How should you interact with your first manager? The engineer-manager relationship is an important one. If you take advantage of it, your manager can put you on the-fast track to success. Like all relationships, it requires some initiative. There are many paths you can take in the software field. The more direct and cogent you are about communicating your goals with your manager, the more help they can offer you. In my experience, this is as simple as starting the conversation. Meet deliberately with your manager to discuss where you want to go and what you aspire to achieve in your engineering career. It's rare to meet a manager who isn't excited to accelerate the career of an ambitious engineer with a clear sense of direction. But we don’t know your ambitions until you tell us. #CTO #engineeringmanagement #softwareengineering

  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    There's telemetry for engineering systems, and then there's telemetry for engineering teams. They're not the same. Code is standardized, more or less. But every team is unique — the metrics of a healthy team can look completely different from organization to organization. What's missing from most "productivity" conversations (and most productivity data) is context of what's actually happening within your organization. For effective teams, that holistic context is critical. #developerproductivity #engineeringperformance #CTO

  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    View profile for Joe Levy, graphic

    CEO @ Uplevel | helping leaders drive effectiveness, efficiency, and alignment with engineering intelligence | personality of a Labrador

    “Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.” I love this quote. Even the best-intentioned plans often have to change when the work starts. Without dedicated time for planning and strategic thinking, developers are left to reactively code their way through unclear requirements and shifting priorities. Lack of communication and shared understanding leads to rework, technical debt, and frustrated teams. Sometimes there are very clear signs of poor planning — some of my favorites: 📅 Lots of meetings with design and product management, even after the design work and tickets were supposed to be complete. 🖥️ A very high abundance of comments on Jira tickets and PRs due to lack of clarity - one of our devs calls these “drama” work. ⏳ Waiting for dependencies - “we need to call an API but the API isn’t done.” What other examples do you see? Measuring planning time is more critical than measuring development time. Yet somehow — because it’s hard to measure planning time — we don’t. We rest on our laurels. We stick to measuring the “real” work (code, tickets, …) but not the planning and design meetings. Measure what matters. That means don’t skimp on the planning. #CTO #planning #softwaredevelopment

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    “For most organizations, half the time and half the money gets spent before a card ever gets to a development team’s backlog.” Flow metrics focus on value delivery rather than process efficiency or developer productivity, looking at the entire value stream so that enterprises can identify bottlenecks that lie outside the software team. Flow provides a high-level framework that enterprises will find especially valuable – as long as they combine it with other metrics. See our take in the comments 👇

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    View profile for Joe Levy, graphic

    CEO @ Uplevel | helping leaders drive effectiveness, efficiency, and alignment with engineering intelligence | personality of a Labrador

    How often do you get away from your desk to think? I call this “walk the dog” time. Here’s the problem: 🖥️ Spending time behind a computer doesn’t mean you are productive. 🔒 Staring at a problem for an hour doesn’t mean you’re making progress. Sometimes the best way to write the article, solve the bug, or make the decision is to step away. Stepping away from the computer—whether for a meeting, a walk, or just quiet reflection—sparks the clarity of thought that leads to better code. Think through the problem. See the big picture. Make forward progress by stepping back. Take a walk.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Uplevel reposted this

    Raise your hand if you had to add a label to a bunch of your Jira tickets this week. I know why we have to do it – to bridge the communication gap between the executive team and our engineering teams – but it doesn’t make Jira tickets any less tedious. Here’s where teams usually go wrong with Jira: The executive team sets priorities. We don’t give them licenses in Jira, so those priorities are in Confluence, or Notion, or a Google Doc. We take the priorities and start putting them into Jira. Each engineering team divides the work into smaller and smaller pieces until the details are hard to connect back to the starting priorities. Something is lost in the messy middle. That sparks a vicious cycle: ⭐️ Executives don’t see evidence that engineers are working on company priorities. ⭐️ Engineers have an added responsibility of drawing a clear line between priorities and tasks. The solution is to overhaul how you use Jira. There are thousands of ways to organize Jira. Only a few of those methods are effective at handling this scenario. One approach is to leverage an issue hierarchy, where initiative issues map directly to the company's key priorities, and epics with individual stories rolling up as child tickets underneath. This structure provides better visibility. It also allows for automatic association of labels and other metadata across the hierarchy. If you want to take this further… Use distinct Jira projects for each initiative. Nothing more clearly communicates all this work is for a specific initiative than naming the project after the priority. Remember to regularly review the status of those higher-level epics. Since individual engineers are working on stories and tasks, it can be easy to forget to update the Epic. Reviewing your Roadmap in planning ensures projects are taken to completion and nothing major falls through the cracks. #projectmanagement #engineering #CTO

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Uplevel, graphic

    2,203 followers

    Advice on #GenAI from Steve Morin of Asana: “If you don’t have a basis on this technology of where the limits are, at least at a high level, you’ll have no intuition on even what to challenge your teams on. And that’s dangerous.” Engineering leaders, how are you putting guidelines and guardrails in place for your teams' adoption of Copilot and other AI tools?

Similar pages

Browse jobs

Funding

Uplevel 3 total rounds

Last Round

Series A

US$ 20.0M

See more info on crunchbase