Catriona Riddell’s Post

View profile for Catriona Riddell

Director, Catriona Riddell & Associates

Great to see the Local Government Association support the reintroduction. of strategic planning in its response to the Government's consultation. However, there are a few things in their response that perhaps don't really reflect what is being proposed. They are right to raise concerns about resourcing but simply asking for more planners will not solve the problems LAs face. We need to pull spatial planning resources, share evidence and data and maximize the use of things like digital planning to totally rethink how we plan. Oh, and #letplannersbeplanners by getting rid of all the add-ons. Large spatial planning teams to prepare new strategic plans will help local plans and focusing resourcing on making the plan-led system work will reduce the resources needed further down stream! New strategic plans are unlikely to be based on the current London Plan or the Greater Manchester joint plan models. They will be high level spatial investment frameworks which have a small number of key policy objectives which include allocating housing targets to LPs, identifying strategic infrastructure priorities and reviewing GBs at the strategic level, where relevant. The LGA is arguing that LAs need to be empowered to prepare new strategic plans, working together across LA boundaries. If there is one thing we've learnt over the last 14 years it's that this doesn't work. Just look at the extensive research recently published by the Royal Town Planning Institute and the very recent experience in Oxford for evidence. Putting strategic planning powers in the hands of CAs or other sub-regional bodies is not about taking powers away from LPAs - it's about filling a gap in the system at the right level. Despite concerns raised by Districts in two-tier areas around this, districts have never had responsibility for preparing formal strategic plans. As a councillor said at an event last week, asking LPAs to make decisions around things like housing numbers and Green Belt is like asking turkeys to vote for Christmas. It is so important to raise concerns but we need to grasp this opportunity and find a way forward or the plan-led system will simply be a pipedream with planning by appeal being the norm for a very long time. https://lnkd.in/ehwgqRX5

Sean Tofts BA MSc PGDip

Urban Design and Planning Consultant

6mo

"People cannot and do not live in planning permissions" is a bit sarcastic for a body representing LPAs to say. I don't know how LGA is still banging that drum when the figures they often raise in relation to unbuilt permissions have already been scrutinized and found to be flawed. It's getting a bit tiring for those of us who want to see houses being built to listen to them trott out the same statistics beating in mind they simply highlight the opposite to what the LGA think they are doing. We need more permissions that are pending construction, not less. The LGA is also too broad a church, to borrow a term someone at the RTPI said to me, to really say much of any real conviction.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics