Dr. Chris Carpenter’s Post

View profile for Dr. Chris Carpenter, graphic

Formerly Senior lecturer at Canterbury Christ Church University

I was struck by the report on the BBC website (6 March 2024) that Birley Academy in Sheffield could lose funding because of ‘underperformance’. The report says that the community college, which has 1,000 pupils on roll has been inspected twice by Ofsted since 2017 and was rated as ‘requires improvement’ on both occasions. As a result, the school may well lose funding. I am not able to comment on the validity of the inspection findings.  What struck me was that reducing funding was an odd ‘punishment’ although it can be seen as a clear marker of an ostensibly public service, such as a school, being in a market.  Who will suffer from funding being reduced? The staff at the school or the children or both? Will having less funding help the staff improve the school? Presumably the idea is that they will have to try harder! I can feel Mrs Thatcher's ideology at work here! In a time where, arguably, economic rationality seems the dominant ideology this might have skewed our collective thinking? Ball (2003) claimed that schools exist in a time of punishment and reward for compliance with policy where public naming and shaming are accepted. In this we have allowed Ofsted to become a reality definer. A teacher once said to me “I know we are a good school because Ofsted says so”. There would have been a time when if a school was struggling like this the LEA, remember them, would have mobilised their resources to help the school on the basis that this would be the best for the children who attend that school. I find it very revealing that the report makes no mention of ‘children’ or ‘students’. It is almost as if they are merely a means for the school to ‘score’ well on the quantifiable and measurable criteria that ‘really’ matter. What do people think? https://lnkd.in/eScgcwgp

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics