“The U.K.’s data protection watchdog claims a crackdown on websites that don’t ask for consent from visitors to track and profile their activity for ad targeting is bearing fruit. However it’s admitted some of the changes driven by the intervention have seen sites adopting a controversial type of paywall that demands users pay a fee to access content or else agree to being tracked and profiled for ad targeting (also known as “pay or consent”). […] The regulator told TechCrunch it opted for a reprimand in this case, rather than a sanction, as it believes it’s a proportionate use of its powers — ‘based on what will achieve the best outcome, as well as based on our priorities and limited resources.’” #Privacy #GDPR #dataprotection #UKICO #PayorConsent Subscribe to EDPO's newsletter here: https://lnkd.in/dwK8sde *This article was not written by EDPO. The opinions and views of the author(s) do not necessarily represent those of EDPO. https://lnkd.in/gzpbJKFE
EDPO (European Data Protection Office)’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
More from the #Masterofprivacy!
[EN] Given that neither #privacy advocates nor #competition authorities or digital #advertising stakeholders found the #PrivacySandbox to be a reliable alternative to third-party #cookies, it was becoming clear that they were to be replaced by a combination of consent pop-up armageddon and far more intrusive ID-based targeting solutions. In sum, the worst of both worlds. We are instead presented with a single persistent choice (yet to be defined) and two alternative frameworks for interests-based or profile-based advertising -the line is more blurred than it sounds-, with the current solution (cookies) representing the latter. Again, a summary of all key facts on the timeline (in the context of my conversation with Carissa Véliz, hosted by Ethical Commerce Alliance) before kicking-off a couple of interviews expanding on those thoughts - on Masters of Privacy https://lnkd.in/d5FrgSuf
Nobody was ready for the Privacy Sandbox, but deprecating cookie banners is long overdue
medium.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
[EN] Given that neither #privacy advocates nor #competition authorities or digital #advertising stakeholders found the #PrivacySandbox to be a reliable alternative to third-party #cookies, it was becoming clear that they were to be replaced by a combination of consent pop-up armageddon and far more intrusive ID-based targeting solutions. In sum, the worst of both worlds. We are instead presented with a single persistent choice (yet to be defined) and two alternative frameworks for interests-based or profile-based advertising -the line is more blurred than it sounds-, with the current solution (cookies) representing the latter. Again, a summary of all key facts on the timeline (in the context of my conversation with Carissa Véliz, hosted by Ethical Commerce Alliance) before kicking-off a couple of interviews expanding on those thoughts - on Masters of Privacy https://lnkd.in/d5FrgSuf
Nobody was ready for the Privacy Sandbox, but deprecating cookie banners is long overdue
medium.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“Europe's top court has ruled that Meta Platforms must restrict the use of personal data harvested from Facebook for serving targeted ads even when users consent to their information being used for advertising purposes, a move that could have serious consequences for ad-driven companies operating in the region. "An online social network such as Facebook cannot use all of the personal data obtained for the purposes of targeted advertising, without restriction as to time and without distinction as to type of data," the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) said in a ruling on Friday. In other words, social networks, such as Facebook, cannot keep using users' personal data for ad targeting indefinitely, the court said, adding limits must be set in place in order to comply with the bloc's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) data minimization requirements.” Under GDPR Article 5(1)(c), companies can only process necessary personal data, preventing third-party data from being used for targeted ads without proper limits. Privacy activist Max Schrems filed a case in 2014, arguing that a social media platform targeted him with ads based on his sexual orientation. The European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruled that social platforms cannot aggregate and analyze personal data, like sexual orientation, from external sources for targeted advertising without explicit consent. This highlights how GDPR plays a key role in protecting personal data from being used for targeted ads without clear consent. Companies also need to ensure they strictly comply with GDPR by limiting data processing to what is necessary and obtaining explicit consent for sensitive information. https://lnkd.in/gGwFy7uY #cybertronium #cybertroniummalaysia #dataprivacy #adverstising
E.U. Court Limits Meta's Use of Personal Facebook Data for Targeted Ads
thehackernews.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
M.S. Marketing, Baruch College I Digital Marketer I Media Professional I Programmatic Advertising Specialist
GDPR-like restrictions on data privacy & ad targeting could be coming to the US. Will be interesting to see if this gathers steam in Congress while so many other issues are taking center stage. While ad targeting could be negatively impacted, marketers might actually benefit from a nationwide standard in data privacy regulation, as opposed to the state-by-state patchwork we have now. https://lnkd.in/dGgdPHNJ
Proposed US federal privacy bill, which would limit ad targeting, ‘has legs’
thedrum.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The privacy organisation NOYB (None Of Your Business) has filed a GDPR complaint against Microsoft's advertising broker subsidiary, Xandr. NOYB said that Xandr is collecting extraordinary amounts of data to profile users to operate its services, but data on its own website shows that it complied with none of the 1,294 access requests and 660 deletion requests made under GDPR. Many people are not going to have heard of Microsoft's Xandr or what it does. NOYB has a nice explainer in its announcement: "If companies want to use targeted advertising to promote their products or services online, they have to go through so-called Real Time Bidding (RTB) platforms. One such platform is run by Microsoft subsidiary Xandr, which allows advertisers to buy ad space on websites or in mobile apps in a fully automated way. When a user visits a website, an algorithmic auction takes place in order to decide which company can display an advertisement. Because a users’ interests and characteristics ultimately determine an advertiser’s willingness to place an ad, Xandr collects and shares a massive amount of personal data in order to profile the users and to allow for targeting. Much of that data is bought by external parties like emetriq, a subsidiary of [Deutsche Telekom]." #databreach #GDPRbreach https://lnkd.in/d8cUR6S6
Privacy group NOYB files GDPR complaint against Microsoft's ad broker firm Xandr
neowin.net
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Strategy, Digital Transformation, Data & Identity in Media, Technology & Sport. APAC Head of Product Marketing & Strategy - Data Management & AI at Adobe. Non-Executive Director at Netball Australia (incl Super Netball)
Front row seats on the 3P cookie deprecation rollercoaster 🎢 1. IAB task force says Chrome sandbox does not support most use cases (including lookalike modeling, competitive separation on the page, audience creation, video advertising, frequency capping and most forms of ad reporting): https://lnkd.in/gEe4tiz2 CMA says hold my beer… 2. Reporting Privacy Sandbox does not meet anti-competitive expectations - favouring Google services and limiting competitor access to same data whilst also rendering the ability of publishers and advertisers to be less effective on identifying fraudulent activity. https://lnkd.in/gQ3bG-yb #dataprivacy #privacy #cookieless #customerdatamanagement
Google 'cannot proceed with third-party cookie deprecation'
searchengineland.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It’s not just third-party cookies that will cause signal loss for brands. With privacy law reforms speeding towards the marketing and media industry, pretty much every identifier used for ad targeting is under threat. During this week’s D_Coded News Corp event, panellists from Journey Beyond, Omnicom, AdFixus and LiveRamp predicted chaos ahead but some emerging opportunities – including a 150 per cent lift in performance for Journey Beyond off its News Corp partnership – if consented first party data is harnessed right. News Corp Australia Kristiaan Kroon Daniella Harkins Pippa Leary Wade Stokes Roland Irwin Omnicom Media Group
Chaos incoming: Omnicom, News, Journey Beyond, LiveRamp, Adfixus forecast deep impact as privacy overhaul accelerates, brands scramble for consent, legal teams fear ‘fair and reasonable’ fallout | Mi3
mi-3.com.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Some of Australia’s largest and best-known brands are being urged to remove a tracking tool from Chinese-owned social media giant TikTok amid revelations it is harvesting Australians’ data including email addresses, mobile phone numbers and browsing histories without their knowledge or consent, in a potential breach of the nation’s privacy laws. TikTok’s tracking tool, known as a pixel, is an invisible piece of code that tracks a user’s web history and personal information, even if the user doesn’t have a TikTok account. The pixel can then track a user across the internet and piece together their identity including their email, phone number and buying habits – even if they don’t have TikTok on their phone. Marketers often use tracking pixels for legitimate purposes, including re-targeting campaigns and to deliver more relevant ads that follow users across websites. Tech giants such as Meta (owner of Facebook) and Google have their own tracking pixels. But tests show the pixel from TikTok, owned by Beijing-based parent company ByteDance, doesn’t wait for user consent and is more aggressive in how it scrapes the data – data that may be made available for sharing with other Chinese corporations and the Chinese government. The revelations have prompted calls for Australia’s information commissioner to urgently launch an investigation and for websites to remove TikTok’s tracking pixel. Read more in my story for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald. https://lnkd.in/g68_9w-b
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Google is updating its practices to comply with new state privacy laws and user opt-out preferences. This means they'll be enabling Restricted Data Processing (RDP) for new state laws and honoring Global Privacy Control opt-outs, which will disable personalized ad targeting for opted-out users. This change is a step towards keeping advertisers on the right side of the law, but may impact ad targeting efficiency and personalization capabilities. #Google #Privacy #DataProtection
Google to honor new privacy laws and user opt-outs
searchengineland.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Where do we draw the line in a marketing environment where consumers can opt out of “targeting?” Would an ad on a bus stop, targeting local people be in breach, if it didn’t run “exclusions?” This and other great questions were posed at the IAB Data and Privacy Summit this week. It left me questioning if the new Privacy reform may end up restrictive to the point it is unworkable. #Privacy #Marketing
To view or add a comment, sign in
68,348 followers