(Below is my personal opinion, not FTA's)
Many years ago, a Hong Kong actor shared his thought about NYC after his visit and said, "NYC is a heaven above ground, and a hell underground." In "heaven," there are marvelous buildings, interesting streets, and beautiful parks that fascinate numerous people. On the other hand, "hell" tortures riders with delayed trains, dysfunctional communication systems, limited accessibility, etc. Has NYC's transit system ALWAYS been this "hellish?" Absolutely not - there was a time when the system was marvelous, interesting and beautiful and served as a role model for many others. However, due to insufficient infrastructure investments in subsequent years, the system condition has deteriorated. There was once a golden opportunity to reverse this trend with revenue from congestion pricing. The $15 billion could have been generated to improve accessibility, electrify buses, replace elevators and escalators, upgrade infrastructure and power, purchase new railcars and buses, expand subway lines, and modernize signals. NYC could have been the trailblazer in the US in turning things around for public transit and delivering high-quality services its residents and visitors rightfully and urgently deserve. The decision to indefinitely pause congestion pricing is not only unwise, but also harmful to the city's future in the long term. Despite this upsetting setback, I do believe that the push for congestion pricing will continue because it is the right solution for many transit problems in NYC. The recently paused proposal was developed after years of discussions and work. Now it may take many more years before the actual implementation, but one day we will get there and make underground a "heaven" as well. Stay optimistic.
Senior Launch Manager
5moIMO, congestion pricing is on the right track, but misses on the equity component. Congestion pricing prioritizes people and businesses that can afford it while they push those costs to the consumer. Thus it punishes those individuals that cannot push those costs elsewhere. This unintentionally becomes class warfare. I would hope that another solution can be found, maybe based on a lottery system, or at very least, using the proceeds to incentivize those that are being pushed out.