Evidence for Policy Design (EPoD)’s Post

Check out the new paper by yours truly, Gudrun Østby, Adrian Arellano and Thomas Hegghammer about the links between economic deprivation and terrorism and how to better empirically identify them. Freshly accepted by International Studies Review. Have a look at the pre-print version! https://lnkd.in/eQkUq2ad

"Call for Working Papers: The UNESCO Chair of the NUP welcomes contributions by young and senior scholars for the online publication series “NUP UNESCO/Jean Monnet Working Papers”; this initiative builds upon the successful NUP Jean Monnet Working Papers series, which exists since 2020. We accept manuscripts on topics related to human development and security, the fight against transnational crime and economic crime, money laundering, the financing of terrorism, asset recovery, asset freezes and confiscation, financial investigations, judicial cooperation in criminal matters, etc."

Reviewing some abstracts tonight and thought this was interesting in regards to reading + national security…. Abstract In an era of unprecedented global challenges and complex information landscapes, the ability to read at an advanced level has emerged as a critical factor in ensuring the security and stability of democratic nations. This paper, *Reading for Our Republic*, explores the indispensable role that advanced literacy plays in safeguarding national security, promoting economic resilience, and fostering social cohesion within a republic. It argues that a well-informed and literate citizenry is the foundation of a strong democracy, capable of making informed decisions, resisting misinformation, and engaging meaningfully in civic life. The paper examines how advanced reading skills support the effectiveness of military and intelligence operations, contribute to economic innovation and competitiveness, and enhance global diplomatic efforts. Additionally, it highlights the importance of literacy in mitigating domestic threats by promoting social cohesion and reducing the appeal of extremist ideologies. By linking the act of reading to the broader framework of national security, this paper calls for a renewed focus on literacy as a strategic priority, essential for the preservation and advancement of democratic values in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

Call for Papers: Panoply Journal 2024 by CIRIS – Shaping the Future of International Relations The Center for International Relations and International Security (CIRIS) is excited to announce the Call for Papers for the 2024 edition of the Panoply Journal. As a leading platform dedicated to illuminating the complexities of global diplomacy and security, we invite scholars, researchers, and practitioners to contribute their insightful analyses and perspectives. Theme for 2024: "Navigating New Frontiers and old legacies in Global Relations" In an era marked by rapid transformations and emerging challenges, the 2024 edition seeks to explore the evolving landscape of international relations. We encourage submissions that address a range of topics including, but not limited to, global governance, cybersecurity, climate change and environmental policy, human rights, economic diplomacy, and conflict resolution. Submission Guidelines: Formatting: APA (7th Edition) citation style Language: English (UK or US standard) Manuscripts should be original, unpublished work and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All submissions will undergo a rigorous peer-review process, ensuring the highest standards of academic rigor and scholarly insight. Submission Process: Papers should be submitted electronically through our dedicated submission portal on the CIRIS website. Detailed submission instructions and guidelines can be found at https://lnkd.in/eZxFV6Q2. Why Publish with Panoply Journal? Publishing with the Panoply Journal offers the unique opportunity to contribute to critical discussions influencing international policy and academic debate. Authors gain exposure to a diverse international audience of academics, policymakers, and thought leaders. We look forward to receiving your submissions and to your valuable contributions in shaping the discourse on international relations and security. For inquiries, please contact Dominique Batiste or go to https://lnkd.in/eKbm3nVA https://lnkd.in/ecmWj6_x

In 2022, I published a piece on the need for reform of the unsc which remains as relevant as before. However not everyone grasp the rationale thereof and How to move from a to b and Why to do so or have other minor niggling issues or Micro-motives to Keep momentum. https://lnkd.in/dcbAWJsH

🆕 The role of economics in promoting lasting peace What are the key ingredients for curbing armed conflict and achieving a transition to lasting peace and prosperity? Today on #VoxDevTalks, Dominic Rohner (HEC Lausanne - The Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Lausanne, CEPR - Centre for Economic Policy Research) discusses his forthcoming book the "Peace Formula" and outlines what he has learned from historical episodes and cutting-edge academic research about how to promote peace and end armed conflict: https://lnkd.in/eKEc3S_Q

New open-access article published with Small Wars & Insurgencies! Based on fieldwork research and the use of creative research methods, the article shows the different forms in which communities cooperate with armed actors while maintaining their autonomy (self-governing capabilities). The full article is available here: https://lnkd.in/eMWWs56d

“The Tension Between Liberal Peace Approaches to Post-War Reconstruction and the Human Security Concept: Probing the case of Rwanda’s Repressive Peace” (Paper submitted as part of the coursework of the Postgraduate Diploma in Global Security with King's College London School of Security Studies) Abstract: Due to the complexity of the post-conflict reconstruction process, researchers in the field of international relations and security studies have offered several approaches for dealing with the post-conflict reconstruction phase, and among these approaches are the liberal peace approsch and the human security approach. Though both approaches aim to promote peace and stability in post-war reconstruction, they differ in their emphasis, actors, and implementation. This paper focuses on the tension between the two approaches and critically analyzes their effectiveness in leading post-conflict societies into a new era of peace and development. It focuses on Rwanda as an example of a country that experienced years of bloodshed in a vicious civil war in the 1990s and then a long process of post-conflict recovery, and it attempts to reveal if any of approaches was adopted to help the country through its reconstruction process. The paper starts with an overview of both approaches; the liberal peace approaches and the human security concept, their key principles and limitations. Then, it focuses on the example of Rwanda and examines the applicability of each approach in its post-conflict reconstruction process. The paper is concluded with a summary of the tensions between the liberal peace and the human security and suggest areas for further research.

An excellent simple breakdown of policies to combat disinfo/info manipulation!