This is a really interesting finding. Advisers are fond of telling their clients to invest with long term horizons in mind and not to get spooked by market volatility.
Is this evidence that advisers have been spooked by culture wars or the current outperformance of non-sustainable assets like oil and gas stocks, and less focused on longer term concerns over stranded assets?
Moreover, should we worry that advisers' negative sentiment on sustainable investments could reduce their likelihood of presenting a balanced view of ESG to their clients?
All advisers are not the same, clearly, but the industry has a duty to help clients choose suitable investments according to their preferences and values. Consumer Duty only reinforces this.
#investments #ESG #advisers #consumerduty
Director, Responsible Investing Advisory
1moGreat piece, Faye! We spend a lot of time talking about the S here too. I think people outside the industry often misunderstand responsible investing or ESG investing as the intention to do good at the expense of returns, whereas the reality is that it's about making better, more sustainable investment decisions. As far as social issues are concerned, things like trade union disputes at Starbucks, mining sites not having their licenses renewed due to Indigenous opposition (Rio Tinto recent example), regulation like the Modern Slavery Act in Canada requiring disclosure from global companies...All can have very tangible financial impacts, both in terms of risks and opportunities, and at the end of the day, that's what clients are paying their asset managers to identify!