Outstanding work Dave! Leap strides in taking the "I think, IMO" and otherwise subjectivity out of assessing, predicting and prescribing and controlling for performance vs. changes. The ability to understand baseline and control for outcomes to future changes in the man (unisex definition) and machine system (HMI) is powerful. When is this going to be adopted universally across DOD platforms? With all of the desire and push to reduced crew, increased automation / autonomy, et al, in the Commercial side, it would seem that applying this would be critical to safely and rationally accelerating regulatory and public acceptance and adoption in the commercial realm.
Early in my role as a Requirements Officer, following a meeting I had spent weeks preparing for, my wife asked, "How did it go?" I replied, "I'll let you know in four years." When it comes to larger programs, the time from funding to fielding can feel unsatisfying. But every so often, there's a chance to deliver with true "speed to the Fleet." The Simulators at Sea initiative was one of those moments—a great example of what a strong government-industry partnership can achieve for the warfighter. It wasn't easy, but thanks to the tireless efforts of many, they made it look effortless. I’m incredibly proud to have been apart of this effort and thankful for everyone who played a much larger role than I in supporting the Hawkeye community and Naval Aviation in delivering this critical capability. Check out Navy’s press release below! https://lnkd.in/eufAwvZ3