I'm the only one left but I kinda wish Ron Johnson's reinvention of JCPenney had worked a decade+ ago. He came in strong backed by a board that wanted to change what JCP was. The goal? Become "America's favorite store." And they took some pretty awesome steps towards that.
* Sales and coupons were gone. Pricing was just pricing.
* All prices ended in .00 – no .99, .97, whatever.
* Quality and style of goods were at least a half-step up from other mid-tier retailers.
* Made a big splash in fashion and started putting trendier stuff in stores, but didn't go too hard on trends; menswear options were notably better and womenswear started to come around.
* Added in smaller boutique-y brands that actually were boutique-y.
Late in his term there, Creative Director Nick Wooster was asked what JCP needed to do to be successful and he said, "Make cute shit." “If we have compelling product, people will come into the store. I firmly believe that’s the job of merchants." He wasn't wrong.
But.
The product wasn't enough. Johnson did too much too soon and everything all at once. He famously did no real research of existing customers – pretty much disregarding them – and acted like JCP was a clean slate. It wasn't. Sales completely tanked. When they did, discounts came back almost immediately despite an atypical bravado from him and other leaders on the approach being right. That didn't work and Johnson was gone pretty quickly, replaced by his predecessor.
JCPenney today soldiers on, but – to me – it's indistinguishable from any other mid-price retailer. Sales and coupons rule the day as they always have; the goods are fairly interchangeable with other stores: okay but unremarkable. Of course, Target and Walmart ended up nibbling away at the space JCP was aiming for, and the entire mid-tier is getting eaten from below.
There were some excellent ideas in Johnson's JCP era. It's too bad they weren't executed well.
Owner at Exchange du Nord
1wYou should update and note that Minnesota is always tax free for apparel.