Friends and business colleagues ask if I’m a pro-nuclear guy. I usually get a few chuckles - or confused stares (which happens a lot when I talk - but I digress 🙄) - when I respond clarifying that no, I’m a pro-reliable Grid guy.
Or, to expand, I’m a pro-“ensure the Grid provides a sufficient amount of reliable, resilient, affordable, safe, and sustainable amount of electricity” kind of guy. For clarity, ‘sustainability’ encompasses environmental concerns, including issues related to the changing climate.
This means to assess every technology against these criteria, then compare the technologies against each other in the context of how they contribute to the Grid. This enables an ‘apples to apples’ comparison of different technologies against other technologies based on the roles they play - or replace - to support Grid operations.
The fuels that support these changes, and their associated emissions, can then be factored in - even as a driver. However, this way Grid reliability is maintained or enhanced, if new technologies completely replace the current ways of accomplishing the expected end results - the lights go on when I flick the switch, NOT when the government says it’s my turn to have light.
Back to nuclear. Starting with these criteria and using facts plus decades of performance, while I don’t start with nuclear, that’s usually where I end-up in most applications. And all based on comparisons to other options.
This latest article by Doomberg is another example of this thought process playing out.
So, what are next steps for nuclear:
1. Demonstrate large nuclear plants can be built on schedule and under budget - no excuses.
2. Deploy competitive technology that provides flexible generation - with projects delivered on time and under budget.
(Hint: Off-site manufacturing combined with on-site assembly is NOT nirvana that magically guarantees all quality, cost, construction, configuration management, and schedule issues will be satisfactorily addressed).
Advocate for a globally competitive #AUSTRALIANFUSIONENERGYINDUSTRY with strategic communications expertise.
3moYou didn't mention that it also separated Fusion from Fission, allowing Fusion faster development,